U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
Old 11-21-2017, 05:44 PM
Location: NE Ohio
30,131 posts, read 15,685,319 times
Reputation: 8800


Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
If the Supreme Court issues an opinion that the law violates the constitution the states might listen. In this case it's one rogue judge. The SC has already upheld similar laws on drinking ages. The so-called judge is making the judiciary look bad.
Do the Courts know more about the Constitution than those who created it? The States have ultimate authority over the Courts. James Madison said, the States are superior to the courts in matters of Constitutional interpretation. Why? Because the States created the Constitution.

We often forget that the Supreme Court, the Judiciary Branch, is the 3rd Branch of Government. It is part of the Federal Government. It is not over the Federal Government. The States are over and superior to the Federal Government.

Old 11-21-2017, 05:54 PM
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,025,001 times
Reputation: 1335
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You can work to change things.
"My" government listens only to the Central Banking Families, everything else is just smoke and mirrors. After all, I was decreed a "citizen" at birth, and am only a subject of the State. People have rights, "citizens" have only privileges granted or taken away by whim of government.

As long as the "government" has a fictional right to initiate force against the individual, no person is truly free and no person truly has rights. You can't change and institution of aggression, you can only conquer it, destroy it, and replace it with a retaliatory force to protect you from aggressors like the present form of government.

The best that ordinary people can do under the dark shadow of the aggression of the State upon the individual is to practice agorism and counter-econimics and hope to starve the evil beast to death.
Old 11-21-2017, 06:46 PM
Location: The Republic of Texas
60,497 posts, read 30,701,915 times
Reputation: 12888
The government givith... the government can surely take it away. Nothing unconstitutional about that. No rights are violated.
Old 11-21-2017, 07:07 PM
8,162 posts, read 4,470,866 times
Reputation: 8772
maybe the problem not with trump idea, but the federal judgeships
Old 11-21-2017, 07:50 PM
Location: Pacific NW
9,249 posts, read 5,395,189 times
Reputation: 7703
Only a liberal would celebrate a "win" for supporting illegals.
Old 11-21-2017, 07:55 PM
Location: Florida
2,471 posts, read 639,356 times
Reputation: 2005
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
What a coincidence the judge is from CA. Who would have guessed? This issue needs to make it's way to the Supreme Court.
These judges that seem to be against the American people's interest, need to be rounded up for treason and hung for all to see.
Old 11-21-2017, 08:10 PM
Location: 22 months till retirement and I can leave the hell hole of New Yakistan
23,292 posts, read 13,027,371 times
Reputation: 5865
Originally Posted by Slats Grobnick View Post
Judge rules Trump's sanctuary city order unconstitutional - CNNPolitics

Repeal Obamacare - fail
Ban Muslims - fail
Build wall and get Mexico to pay for it - fail
cut funding to most American cities - fail
bring jobs back to America - fail

So much winning

stupid liberal judge has no clue about the law

the federal law supersedes state laws, and aiding and abetting, or harboring , aka not sharing or limiting the information given is a violation of federal law.

Immigration laws and quotas are passed and set by the US Congress in Washington, D.C.. Yes, the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate establish all immigration laws and quotas, which is signed by POTUS. This is an indisputable fact ……

by the letter of the law, a city or state with a sanctuary is/will be in violation of that law

A “Sanctuary City” is a City whose local Government has instructed its employees to openly violate the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act passed by the US Congress. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8

I understand that you or other fascist liberals might not see it that way, but that is the truth
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top