U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-24-2017, 05:25 PM
 
Location: St. Louis, MO
4,009 posts, read 5,520,143 times
Reputation: 4547

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sindey View Post
I am an old lady now and I remember race riots etc, I didn't understand then why people can be so filled with hate and fear because of the color of ones skin or their religion or sexual preference. 60 years later and I understand it even less. I love my country and all the different people in it. Personally I think everyone who fears just needs to lighten up and relax. If you have time to spend on why the other guy is different then your not busy enough living your own life. My advice is is to embrace one another and our differences and get rid of the anger and hate.
Beautifully said. Thank you. ♡

 
Old 12-24-2017, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
8,090 posts, read 4,720,747 times
Reputation: 2877
The actual end-goal for the promotion of diversity, is not actually to promote diversity. It is actually to integrate the country(and the world) together.

Ethnic enclaves might be far more united within, but if they are allowed to persist, you end up with countries within countries. A nation of tribes, all divided and potentially hostile to each other. Each tribe perpetually wanting to break away from the rest. The promotion of diversity serves the "national interests". Not only integrating the people of this country, but integrating us with the world.


So long as forced-diversity continues, eventually the whole world will be nothing but a blob of brown people. With a single culture, under a single one-world government. With diversity within and across nations breaking down national borders, making the nation-state pointless.


The division here then, is between the globalists, and the tribalists.


And to the people who aren't fans of diversity, let me just inform you, globalism is simply an inevitability. Capitalism is globalism. Socialism is globalism. The economy is global, and will always be. All of the money ultimately wants a global world, and the money has the power.


Does forced-diversity suck for the common people? Yes. But so what, it isn't going to stop. And complaining will do you no good. You would basically have to destroy the world to stop it.
 
Old 12-24-2017, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,520 posts, read 5,010,722 times
Reputation: 3304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
Sorry to but in, but women’s equal rights, for instance. Islamic orthodoxy does not countenance this.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/p...orth-less.aspx
With all of the sexual harassment and assault allegations shown in the news lately respect for women isn't widely practiced by many Americans...
 
Old 12-24-2017, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Up North
3,939 posts, read 1,030,637 times
Reputation: 2313
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
With all of the sexual harassment and assault allegations shown in the news lately respect for women isn't widely practiced by many Americans...
By that logic then, the majority of women in the Western world would be no better or worse off in...Saudi Arabia, or Iran, or Syria.


LOL...these people.
 
Old 12-24-2017, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,520 posts, read 5,010,722 times
Reputation: 3304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kool Keeth View Post
By that logic then, the majority of women in the Western world would be no better or worse off in...Saudi Arabia, or Iran, or Syria.


LOL...these people.
That's not logic. You just pulled that opinion out of your rear end. In Saudi they don't treat their women with respect, let along provide them equal rights. My personal opinion on Saudi Arabia is we shouldn't be allies with a country like that. We shouldn't turn a blind eye to what they are doing because of oil... But nice try...
 
Old 12-24-2017, 09:22 PM
Status: "I hate living in Georgia!!" (set 18 days ago)
 
48,276 posts, read 45,547,731 times
Reputation: 15366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kool Keeth View Post
That's the thing. Caucasian Americans, if they reach a breaking point...you never know. Maybe we will have a civil unrest not unlike one that occurred in the 1860s...



For me, personally, had we not imported so many third worlders since the 1965 Act, and blacks were still basically part of a small(er) minority, and were struggling like they are today - as extremely conservative as I am - I wouldn't have even been against reparations, not dissimilar to the casinos we gave Natives. But that ship has sailed since we have been overrun in our own lands by (at this pace) hundreds of millions of third world foreigners. It will never happen now - you're on your own, survival of the fittest...



Had that ever occurred to you, ever, that maybe all this insane unhealthy rate of importation of the third world into this country has been DETRIMENTAL to your own race in America?


(I think I've gathered that you're African-America, forgive me if I was wrong about that. Though the point still stands.)
Well, you really don't know for a fact where demographics will go in the next 30 to 50 years. I don't know. And something else. Many immigrants who came to America from Europe during the late 19th century, many were coming from areas that had 3rd world conditions. The very poor have been coming for ages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Povert...strian_Galicia

The Black population at one time made up 1/3 of the USA's population. Of course that was due to slaves outnumbering Whites in certain parts of the South. Immigration changed that though.

And saying that you would be for reparations if "Blacks were part of a smaller minority" just tells me what kind of racial vitriol you have. It tells me what I've suspected of you all along. I don't need your feigned "conditional" support for reparations. Just come right out and say what you think. Instead of going on about "white genocide" and all of these conspiracies, just say what you want and get it over with. I get to the point about what I am looking for.

The poor and those coming out of 3rd world conditions have been coming to the USA since immigration to the USA began. At one time several parts of Europe had conditions similar to 3rd world areas. Those days are over. However, places that aren't 3rd world areas today were 3rd world areas at one point. Blacks always had the short end of the stick no matter what. Being enslaved was getting the short end of the stick. Being subjected to the horrors of the KKK and Jim Crow was getting the short end of the stick. I notice this. The South was basically the closest the USA got to a 3rd world country for a long time. Alot of Blacks living in the South (and this is where the majority of Blacks have been and still are within the USA) were living at a 3rd world level. Next to no immigration in alot of places. Didn't matter. High poverty levels among Blacks in the South. High levels of poverty among Blacks elsewhere. High incidences of discrimination that Blacks were subjected to. Jim Crow in the South, informal discrimination in the North and West. More and more Blacks have been entering the middle class since the 1960s, when the Jim Crow laws were struck down, when housing discrimination was made illegal, when more Black people were able to have more access to resources. Sounds more like being discriminated against and being looked down on has more of an impact on Blacks than immigration does.
 
Old 12-25-2017, 01:01 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 4,168,588 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Oh Jesus, listen to yourself. You sound like you're ready to throw on your Swasitka and Black Boots right now. And btw, as someone engaged to a minority, your use of miscegenation comes off as very racist. No one uses that term anymore
I do. And I don't care whether you like it or not.

The accusation of racism doesn't bother me. Racism is just noticing obvious group differences and drawing logical conclusions from those differences.

It is preferring to be around your own kind -- people who look like you.

There is nothing wrong with any of that.

And there is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve your race by discouraging miscegenation, massive immigration, low birth rates, shaming of your race, etc.

Last edited by dechatelet; 12-25-2017 at 01:36 AM..
 
Old 12-25-2017, 01:08 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 4,168,588 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Actually read dechatelet's posts, he comes right out and says he's a white supremacist, and says that white people are superior to all minorities. And even using the term miscegenation is racist, which is why no one (except people like him) use it anymore
I've never said I'm a white supremacist.

I have said whites created most of civilization, which is true, so that it is only natural that they have been in the supreme position.

I am an ethno-nationalist. Every race, ethnicity, religion, language group, or combination thereof should have its own homeland in which it comes first, and everyone else comes second.

Ethno-nationalism is a prescription for world peace and happiness. Forced integration against people's will is a prescription for war.

There should also be an option for people who want to mix with other ethnicities, races, etc.

The world should be based on what people want, not on what you say they should want.

Last edited by dechatelet; 12-25-2017 at 01:36 AM..
 
Old 12-25-2017, 01:11 AM
 
8,262 posts, read 2,446,434 times
Reputation: 5756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
The actual end-goal for the promotion of diversity, is not actually to promote diversity. It is actually to integrate the country(and the world) together.

Ethnic enclaves might be far more united within, but if they are allowed to persist, you end up with countries within countries. A nation of tribes, all divided and potentially hostile to each other. Each tribe perpetually wanting to break away from the rest. The promotion of diversity serves the "national interests". Not only integrating the people of this country, but integrating us with the world.


So long as forced-diversity continues, eventually the whole world will be nothing but a blob of brown people. With a single culture, under a single one-world government. With diversity within and across nations breaking down national borders, making the nation-state pointless.


The division here then, is between the globalists, and the tribalists.


And to the people who aren't fans of diversity, let me just inform you, globalism is simply an inevitability. Capitalism is globalism. Socialism is globalism. The economy is global, and will always be. All of the money ultimately wants a global world, and the money has the power.


Does forced-diversity suck for the common people? Yes. But so what, it isn't going to stop. And complaining will do you no good. You would basically have to destroy the world to stop it.
Of course, we will destroy the world if we DON'T stop it, so I'll take my chances with doing what is right.
 
Old 12-25-2017, 01:28 AM
 
272 posts, read 96,415 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
I've never said I'm a white supremacist.

I have said whites created most of civilization, which is true, so it is only natural that they have been in the supreme position.

I am an ethno-nationalist. Every race, ethnicity, religion, language group, or combination thereof should have its own homeland in which it comes first, and everyone else comes second.

Ethno-nationalism is a prescription for world peace and happiness. Forced integration against people's will is a prescription for war.

There should also be an option for people who want to mix with other ethnicities, races, etc.

The world should be based on what people want, not on what you say they should want.
Lets look at how "integrated" some of the most liberal so called multicultural people and their lives ,cities and corporations really are.

Where do people send their children to schools, how integrated are their neighborhoods and businesses are?

Whites have basically opted out of public school integration in most of these liberal "multicultural" cities,

Around 5% white in DC public schools,, Boston public schools are 13 % white, , NYC is less than 10% and also one of the most segregated in the country. Black students are most segregated in the Northeast?

14% of LAs public schools are white and segregation is some of the worst in the country in California schools.


California’s Latino students among the most segregated in the country, says UCLA report

Neighborhoods are worse.

Study blue states to see real white supremacy in action
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top