Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To me personally, the THEN Bill O'Reilly has always been the voice of modern conservatism. Fox news is a joke now. The only one who is a decent debater is Tucker Carlson.
But....how the heck does Rachel the Madcow become the voice of modern Progressivism?
Oh yeah, liberal "men" are women that think they are men.
I think because people look for intelligent and informative news, something that is sorely lacking on most of the Fox News Lineup. Why not just watch reruns of the Miss Universe Pageant.
Lahren has a BA in Broadcasting, Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar with a PHd.
I think because people look for intelligent and informative news, something that is sorely lacking on most of the Fox News Lineup.
Sadly, I agree. I used to love fox news, but not now.
The only person I watch is probably Tucker Carlson. Shepard Smith is somewhat decent too.
Lahren and Jesse Watters are just boring. (They are not very good debaters. )
I found Stefan Molyneux to be intelligent, fair, somewhat balanced. He is probably more libertarian than conservative. Libertarianism is composed of a fairly broad range of beliefs. Any one particular libertarian’s perspective may coincide with a liberal’s, or with a conservative’s, or with neither’s. He's probably a more Conservative-Leaning Libertarian. So youtube conservatives are more interesting to me.
Sadly, I agree. I used to love fox news, but not now.
The only person I watch is probably Tucker Carlson. Shepard Smith is somewhat decent too.
Lahren and Jesse Watters are just boring. (They are not very good debaters. )
I found Stefan Molyneux to be intelligent, fair, somewhat balanced. He is probably more libertarian than conservative. Libertarianism is composed of a fairly broad range of beliefs. Any one particular libertarian’s perspective may coincide with a liberal’s, or with a conservative’s, or with neither’s. He's probably a more Conservative-Leaning Libertarian. So youtube conservatives are more interesting to me.
I had no issues with Bill O'Reilly as he was mostly fair and interesting but Hannity, and the Fox Panels are a different story.
There are plenty of smart conservative women who do much better commentary. Tomi isn't enlightening.
You say she is the voice of modern conservationism but I never heard of her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
