U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-30-2017, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Florida
21,659 posts, read 11,117,335 times
Reputation: 7887

Advertisements

The woman should cover up her udders. That boy seems too old to still be nursing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2017, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Florida
21,659 posts, read 11,117,335 times
Reputation: 7887
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria View Post
Decent spot: wherever the Mom is. Nice you want to deny helpless babies from eating when hungry because you canít handle even the slightest sight of a breast (assuming you then do the reasonable thing of not looking if you donít want to see.)
Go buy the kid a yoo hoo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2017, 04:39 PM
 
4,866 posts, read 2,347,034 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64 View Post
The more I think about some of the responses here, the more they depress me. For Pete's sake, the image of a mother and her child is one of the most enduring in art, in literature...in everything. It's universal.

Forget her looks, forget her tattoos, forget all of the superficial things. A woman is nurturing - nourishing - her baby. The correct response seems, to me, to be not contempt, but tenderness.
That's ridiculous! I'm a woman - and that offends me - I breastfed and never had the whole world viewing to do it. Disney has made special accommodations for those who need to breastfeed - or sit on a bench out of the way. I don't want to see your boobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2017, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Florida
21,659 posts, read 11,117,335 times
Reputation: 7887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64 View Post
The more I think about some of the responses here, the more they depress me. For Pete's sake, the image of a mother and her child is one of the most enduring in art, in literature...in everything. It's universal.

Forget her looks, forget her tattoos, forget all of the superficial things. A woman is nurturing - nourishing - her baby. The correct response seems, to me, to be not contempt, but tenderness.
Her husband could have stood in front of her instead of taking a picture . Ever hear about being modest or discreet? It is a virtue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2017, 04:44 PM
 
3,469 posts, read 951,218 times
Reputation: 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Go buy the kid a yoo hoo.
Yeah, sure, letís give a baby an unhealthy sugary drink instead of an onlooker simply looking elsewhere. Makes so much sense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2017, 10:12 PM
 
457 posts, read 189,258 times
Reputation: 1238
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyriver View Post
If you don't like seeing it, look away. Same as I do when I see some man with huge, hairy man boobs going topless.
Ah, but if men look at what they're showing, women get angry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2017, 07:32 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,952 posts, read 22,524,455 times
Reputation: 15493
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearHeadDave View Post
Many societies view a breast the same way they view an arm or hand. Only in the West do we give them some unique and mystical provenance which says they must be hidden at all times under clothing.
Which shockingly enough is where this happened and where most who post on here live... Maybe she should go to Paris Disney and give it a try there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2017, 07:34 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,952 posts, read 22,524,455 times
Reputation: 15493
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria View Post
Yeah, sure, letís give a baby an unhealthy sugary drink instead of an onlooker simply looking elsewhere. Makes so much sense
How's about a bottle? They do make those nowadays...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2017, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
21,155 posts, read 11,761,610 times
Reputation: 32132
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
How's about a bottle? They do make those nowadays...
Pumping is a pain. Carrying around a bottles of breastmilk that need to be kept cold is a pain. Why should anyone inconvenience themself just because someone else doesn't know how to avert their eyes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2017, 07:38 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,952 posts, read 22,524,455 times
Reputation: 15493
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
Pumping is a pain. Carrying around a bottles of breastmilk that need to be kept cold is a pain. Why should anyone inconvenience themself just because someone else doesn't know how to avert their eyes.
For the same reason you just stated. The same argument can be made about peeing on a bush while waiting in line to get on the rides. Why should that person have to be uncomfortable or inconvenienced by waiting or trying to find a room specifically designed for that?

Having a child IS A PAIN, and inconvenience always goes with the territory (unless you're part of the me,me,me it's all about me crowd).

That's the problem with many nowadays, they want to have a kid,pet etc but don't want to be inconvenienced or caused any "pain" by having to deal with issues that come up along the way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top