U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2017, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,917 posts, read 3,627,758 times
Reputation: 12867

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowne View Post
hint, if she had just fed her kid and not posed for pics, done news interviews and posted pics online, no one would be criticing her. She is screaming for attention. Itís not about feeding her kid.
I'm not sure if you read the story, but she asked her husband to take the picture to capture the looks on the faces of the women behind her, who had been making nasty comments. If they hadn't said anything, there would be no picture, and no story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2017, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Cumberland Co., TN
21,865 posts, read 21,703,455 times
Reputation: 21472
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowne View Post
hint, if she had just fed her kid and not posed for pics, done news interviews and posted pics online, no one would be criticing her. She is screaming for attention. Itís not about feeding her kid.
I'm sure not as many would be criticizing her if there were not photos and social media. I dont know her intent. The article states it was posted on a breastfeeding mothers group. Regardless, it did go "viral" and that's no excuse to attack the woman's nursing breasts, her weight or her decision to breast feed her child at the age of 10 months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:07 AM
 
13,537 posts, read 7,400,589 times
Reputation: 12458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64 View Post
I'm not sure if you read the story, but she asked her husband to take the picture to capture the looks on the faces of the women behind her, who had been making nasty comments. If they hadn't said anything, there would be no picture, and no story.
She was interviewed for the news, her choice. She is intentionally in your face. People are mocking her low rent appearance. Boobs hanging to her waistline by 24, each tattooed, in a skimpy tank top. I have seen that nasty look on the beaches of Daytona.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,008 posts, read 3,143,711 times
Reputation: 14480
As far as I know, it's still not illegal to display pancakes in public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:16 AM
 
23,908 posts, read 11,903,440 times
Reputation: 10107
Some call it just natural.

So I can whip it out and pee where and when I want since it’s natural.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:17 AM
Status: "Kamala/Pete 2020!! Make it happen, people." (set 10 days ago)
 
7,356 posts, read 2,925,345 times
Reputation: 6211
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Dang, and here I thought I defended her right to take care of her kid in public and called out those who demeaned her appearance.
You certainly did.

...I am sorry this thread devolved into a bash-fest about this woman's appearance. That wasn't my purpose for creating the thread. Stupid decision on my part...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:19 AM
 
Location: USA
17,610 posts, read 8,827,681 times
Reputation: 13141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64 View Post
I'm not sure if you read the story, but she asked her husband to take the picture to capture the looks on the faces of the women behind her, who had been making nasty comments. If they hadn't said anything, there would be no picture, and no story.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but she then put the picture on social media. If she didn't want it publicized she would not have done this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:21 AM
 
Location: My House
34,546 posts, read 28,939,764 times
Reputation: 25550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Sorry to burst your bubble, but she then put the picture on social media. If she didn't want it publicized she would not have done this.
I'm pretty sure she put it out there to call out the women who were being so vocally critical of her feeding her child in line.

But, it's the internet, so yeah... she should've known people were going to say dumb stuff, too.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
21,155 posts, read 11,754,604 times
Reputation: 32132
It seems like she was already showing almost as much before she started breastfeeding. Too much cleavage for Disney IMO but she's definitely not the only one who walks around like that on a regular basis not even taking the whole breastfeeding thing into consideration.

I would personally try to avert my eyes and look the other way, but I don't think she should have to get out of line to feed her kid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Cumberland Co., TN
21,865 posts, read 21,703,455 times
Reputation: 21472
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Some call it just natural.

So I can whip it out and pee where and when I want since itís natural.
Do you feed babies with it?
She is not whipping out her pee pee and spraying unsanitary urine where people walk or sit or where children play. She is feeding her child with a breast. The same breast men are legally allowed to expose in public nipple and all.
So you are lobbying for public urination/defecation then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top