Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:09 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,222,208 times
Reputation: 26427

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Clay Banger View Post
Advances might not be welcome, or invited. And men should do better about knowing when they are not wanted. But, it defies logic to suggest that women haven't used their sex appeal to get the places they want to go, including dressing in a manner that is sure to get the attention of the men they want (and don't want) to attract. Have you ever been to a night club or bar in your life? Hell, i've sat in on job interviews where it was painfully clear that cleavage was to be used as part of the candidate's appeal. Sexual harrassment is not acceptable in any form, but this stuff is not rocket science.
What does one have to do with the other? Using sex appeal to get a possible advantage and harassment.? I don't see the connection. People use their assets all the time. Men get hair transplants and expensive watches. Some people in Asian countries get leg lengthening to be taller than the competition. Why pick on women's clothing and sexuality when people all over are doing what they can to get an advantage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
He'll probably get his $10M per year contract paid out plus his golden parachute. He's not going to be hurting for funds.
No diff than all the others with terminated contracts.

At some point, it's about the power and influence more so than the $.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
Great guy - that noble leader of yours...

Donald Trump retweets far-right group's videos - BBC News
^ worthy of its own thread. Pleases consider starting one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:18 AM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,799,509 times
Reputation: 4381
These guys have power and control issues combined with a huge ego is what it is. You make 25 mil a year, live in NYC and you need to harass women at work? They all talked smack on O'Reilly but they are just as bad as he is you gotta love the irony and pot calling the kettle black there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
6,830 posts, read 3,219,107 times
Reputation: 11577
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
I believe the liberal chickens have come home to roost. I never liked Lauer, but this whole 'scandal du jour' is getting ridiculous. Now a man is fired because of a random allegation? No proof?

Men, keep your guards up at work. May be wise to have a digital recorder on you at all times when alone with a female coworker/employee. All it takes is an allegation to destroy your career.
Men, don't be jerks, you'll be fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compression View Post
Men need to have a camera installed on their foreheads to record their daily interactions.

In honor of the forum member that made the suggestion, we'll call them DashCams


CN
Most people are not in positions of tremendeous power and influence.

Most men manage to keep their hands to themselves in their work enviormrnts and do not get accused of sexual misconduct.

I am however, getting a kick out of reading some of the posts whereby ordinary guys seekk to portray themselves as victims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:27 AM
 
1,158 posts, read 960,525 times
Reputation: 3279
Read this was going to happen in a blind item on Foxella on 110917

Matt Lauer – Foxella

Get that popcorn ready.
The A list television personality might want to watch his step. Since he's an established bully among other things, trying to badger others on TV might not be the best choice right now. There is one person in particular who is waiting for an opening reveal all about him which will open the floodgates for others. Get that popcorn ready.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:32 AM
 
13,284 posts, read 8,449,930 times
Reputation: 31512
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
"Matt Lauer fired from NBC "

At least this one went through HR and not the court of public opinion, that's good. It also supposedly happened at the Olympics, which was a fairly recent event. As far as I'm concerned, calling out your offender, in real time (or close to it), is a must do. I've been pretty harsh on women with 20 or 30 years old allegations, so this is a step in the right direction.
yeah so if I say it today I have a better chance of conning the public that it must be true

I am hard pressed to fall victim to this mob mentality in accusing every Joe of inappropriate behavior based on a statement. We've suddenly grown deaf to due diligence in finding out the truth from ALL sides.
Gotta go for now , need to go write a letter and send it to my corporate so they can quickly can someone.

I sincerely beleive that One letter and and one persons words are taking a new meaning to the pen is mighter then the sword. These "victims" certainly are taking advantage of the Few who do and did have good cause for their allegations. I don't see NBC doing anything other then falling victim themselves to rushing to a decision ( 48 hours from the time this was addressed??) . That isn't due diligence...that is them distancing themselves . Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:37 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,222,208 times
Reputation: 26427
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderlust76 View Post
These guys have power and control issues combined with a huge ego is what it is. You make 25 mil a year, live in NYC and you need to harass women at work? They all talked smack on O'Reilly but they are just as bad as he is you gotta love the irony and pot calling the kettle black there.
These uber rich celebrity guys could be surrounded by willing women attending to their every fantasy. They don't want that, they want to pick on the subordinate women at work who are made to feel like crap. They are asserting their dominance over the women in their little kingdom where they think they are the untouchable king.
Think again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by smt1111 View Post
Ok, so the woman who is accusing Matt Lauer is not at blame in any of his behavior. BUT the root cause of all of this is much, much deeper than just a man here or there who crossed boundaries. Women as a whole haven't done anything about the root cause itself--which is that women as a whole have a double standard of behavior and beliefs themselves and have allowed the objectification of women to escalate ever since the sexual revolution. There is a definite double standard. Women cluck cluck over Matt Lauer and various other men's jokes or groping but then turn around and pose naked on magazine covers and make money off of their own objectification. News flash: Men wouldn't be able to go to Hooters if there weren't women willing to work there. Men wouldn't be able to indulge in countless porn magazines and internet porn if there weren't women willing to make money off of it. Women are willing to marry men who are known to have been cheaters and abusers because they are going to get taken care of. Many, many women were willing to put up with a comment and grope here or there to make it big in Hollywood.

We haven't heard from these women. We haven't heard any women with the guts to come forward and say, "Yeah, I put up with the comments and gropings because I made money off of it."
Plenty of Weinstein's accusers have made clear they percieved their careers would be in jeopardy if they previously went public.

Hooter's employees choose to allow patrons to look. They do not agree to be touched.

FLOTUS has a history of suggestively posing in nude/ near nude photos and did so with the encouragement of her eventual husband who has no issue with men admiring his ability to capture such a beauty. Does not give men the right to grope her, does it.

If a man chooses to not control himself perhaps he should avoid looking or maybe relocate to Saudi Arabia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top