Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will Trump try and pardon Flynn?
Yes 60 31.58%
Maybe 49 25.79%
No 81 42.63%
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2017, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,202 posts, read 19,206,363 times
Reputation: 38267

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
This is a very important point. Under our system, proof is needed of allegations. We don't convict people based on mere rumor and innuendo.

If Donald Trump understood that, he'd stop blabbering constantly about Hillary Clinton belonging in prison.
Problem is that many people in this thread seem to think that we don't even convict based on an actual confession and plea bargain. I'm beginning to think they believe it should be based solely on political party affiliation and that if you are a Democrat, you are guilty or something and if you are a Republican, it doesn't matter what you do, you can't be guilty of anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2017, 10:48 AM
 
8,390 posts, read 7,644,416 times
Reputation: 11020
More reading from the Nixon days - May 19, 1973 (Nixon was forced to resign in August 1974):

President Nixon has in effect denied that he knew about the specific illegal acts which culminated in the Watergate break‐in or the subsequent conspiracy to conceal from the courts the truth about these activities. Most people would like very much to think that he was uninvolved, although, if the latest opinion polls are correct, there is widespread uneasiness on the subject.

What is clear, however, is that most of the principals now implicated in this scandal never had any political experience except in Nixon campaigns and never had any government experience except in the Nixon Administration. They are not only the President's appointees but largely his creations. His ethics defined the boundaries of the permissible. His political methods established the pattern to be emulated. The current crisis is grave because the President's dominance over his staff has been so thorough and his political style so distinctive. Only if he re‐examines the values which have brought his Administration to this low point can he begin to master this crisis.[/i]

Watergate Government

Last edited by RosieSD; 12-04-2017 at 11:00 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 10:57 AM
 
Location: crafton pa
977 posts, read 567,485 times
Reputation: 1224
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
That dog just won't hunt...

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz (not exactly a raving right-winger, BTW), would beg to differ:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...a_witness.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:01 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,813,568 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Yeah, wonder indeed.
LOL
What a stupid (and DESPERATE) argument he's made. He KNOWS it's over. It's just a matter of the process playing out.
In my opinion the longer that takes the better. I want it to drag out long enough for the stink of Trump to taint the entire GOP.


Ken
That's my thought.

Trump is not out-of-the-blue oddity. He is exactly what the GOP is about and has been about for some time now.

Democrats could beat on Trump like a bass drum all the way to a majority in the House.

Pelosi knows that calling for his impeachment now is a fool's move.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:02 AM
 
Location: crafton pa
977 posts, read 567,485 times
Reputation: 1224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
I don't think Flynn offered anything that Mueller didn't already know or strongly suspected thru other sources.

Flynn does serve a very useful purpose though. He was an active participant in the various processes Mueller is looking at or else witnessed them first hand.
If that's true, then the evidence from the other sources would be the smoking gun, not Flynn's testimony. Flynn's testimony, to the extent that it agrees with the evidence from other sources, is corroborative, but would not be the decisive factor that it's being presented as in the media.

OTOH, if Flynn's testimony is all the evidence there is, then the case seems to be pretty weak. You would have a case based solely on the testimony of a person who is a self-admitted, convicted liar. Further, the testimony (if we are to believe all the hype) was given because the prosecution had all kinds of evidence that would have allowed them to charge Flynn with much more serious crimes, therefore making the testimony coerced to at least some degree. A case based only on the coerced testimony of a known liar is not the stuff that a prosecutor dreams of going to trial with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:03 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,813,568 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by stremba View Post
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz (not exactly a raving right-winger, BTW), would beg to differ:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...a_witness.html
Dershowitz is indeed a RWinger. He's on Fox spouting nonsense all the time.

Have you bothered to even read what he's been saying for months?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:04 AM
 
1,748 posts, read 2,478,886 times
Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
Who said anything about Dowd?

This is not some small blip from the GOP.

Go look and see what your Main Stream fake stream media is NOT saying.

Ross' not-vetted report?

Hell, not vetted? It's an outright lie.

No pushback from their own editors or anchor? A stock market mini-crash because of your fake news?

Are y'all smoking crack?

MSNBC doesn't cover murder verdicts or anything damning to the DNC, but instead puts Howdy Doodie Adam Schiff to hypothesize for 12 minutes.
Deflecting with this bogus story won't work. The only one smoking crack right now seems to be you..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:11 AM
 
1,748 posts, read 2,478,886 times
Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
From the minute he asked Comey to back off, then fired him when he didn't agree, every single action by the President shows he is afraid of what will come out in the investigation.
Exactly!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:33 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,008,828 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
If you are really taking a "let's see before deciding guilt or innocence" then you clearly are not a Trumpling. The poster mistook your position because it should be obvious by now that the true Trumplings have already made their decision and they have proclaimed the man innocent. This is totally preposterous, obviously, because none of us know what has and will be discovered.

That's why it appears as if they are not interested in learning the truth, they are more interested in protecting their President. Again that's preposterous. Every American deserves the truth and we will only get that by allowing the investigation to continue without the President doing everything possible to hinder it.
He is in fact innocent until some investigation,trial and conviction show him to be guilty just like every other citizen in the U.S. is "supposed to be". There has been no,repeat NO evidence so far that Trump is guilty of anything except having run away fingers and mouth. Those two things are not illegal.

If/when there is evidence and a charge then and only then will anyone have any idea of what's really gone/going on. Everything up to that point is just partisan pap...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:35 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,008,828 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
New story out that Trump apparently has a plan to interfere with the coming census--which if done to favor the GOP (and why else would it be considered) would be a major step forward in voter suppression policies the GOP has been doing on state level for a decade or more
I know my Texas/GOP majority legislature has certainly done it--and been sued--and lost--and appealed all the way to the Supreme Court where one case was heard earlier this year...

Very SCARY if you are a believer in true democracy...and not just your political party...

And since any step toward impeachment has to come from Congress and a GOP majority Congress that would be protected from any election loss by skewing voters' power to vote for anyone NOT GOP--
Well that seems another end around method for Trump protecting himself and his allies from this investigation...
Yeah, sure. Maybe he's going to start counting Aliens from mars or Xenu some other planet now? More crap from the insane among us...<bold>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top