Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2017, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,177 posts, read 19,174,827 times
Reputation: 14880

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
Nope, that's not the question going around, except by those who are desperately and futilely trying to deflect from the investigation that is actually occurring right now, the one that is the topic of this thread.
Can you tell us where it's going around? I'd love to read it and get the backstory.

 
Old 12-06-2017, 05:39 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,358,607 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Prove it.
https://global.handelsblatt.com/fina...mueller-861828

Apparently using google is hard.
 
Old 12-06-2017, 05:48 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Quotes from your article (You should have read it - apparently reading is hard for some people):

Quote:
To be clear, we never wrote that Mr. Mueller had definitely subpoenaed financial records relating to the president. To quote our own story: “It remains unclear whether Mr. Mueller requested information on President Trump’s own business dealings with Deutsche Bank or on those of people close to him.”

....

According to our information, the subpoena from Mr. Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US elections, is in connection with Mr. Trump’s camp, requiring the bank to provide information on financial transactions and loans. It remains unclear whether the subpoena relates to the US president personally or a family member. Given that qualification, we are standing by our reporting.
Bloomberg is reporting that they have obtained a clarification about who the subpoena relates to, and it is Paul Manafort.

This was not at all the story that was originally pushed in a completely hysterical manner by nearly every large news outlet. Clearly, that original story was just another example of fake news by the mass media.

And don't think that President Trump is likely to just let this slide, either.
 
Old 12-06-2017, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,814,474 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Quotes from your article (You should have read it - apparently reading is hard for some people):

Bloomberg is reporting that they have obtained a clarification about who the subpoena relates to, and it is Paul Manafort.

This was not at all the story that was originally pushed in a completely hysterical manner by nearly every large news outlet. Clearly, that original story was just another example of fake news by the mass media.

And don't think that President Trump is likely to just let this slide, either.
And your point is?

It states very clearly Trump or family member.


You wanted proof, you got it.
 
Old 12-06-2017, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,521,957 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking tRump and his dirty Douche Bank deals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
And don't think that President Trump is likely to just let this slide, either.
Hey!

That's right. tRump "warned" Mueller not to look at his finances. He mentioned a "red line."

No doubt Mueller is scared.

 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:39 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
And your point is?

It states very clearly Trump or family member.


You wanted proof, you got it.
So Paul Manafort is a member of Trump's family? That is breaking news! {Sarcasm}
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
3,614 posts, read 1,734,707 times
Reputation: 2740
Looks like this was just another pile of bull**** too.
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,929,539 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
So Paul Manafort is a member of Trump's family? That is breaking news! {Sarcasm}
Kush is and he is an up coming target, was a given from the beginning. The we move on to daddy......
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,814,474 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
So Paul Manafort is a member of Trump's family? That is breaking news! {Sarcasm}
Handlesblatt is not Bloomsberg. It's not NYTimes either. Nor any of the others.

It is confirming only what it wrote. If you have problems with their confirmation,why don't you ask them?
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,814,474 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Kush is and he is an up coming target, was a given from the beginning. The we move on to daddy......
Yep. And I wouldn't be surprised if Mueller requested info on both Kush and Trump.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top