Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:17 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,075 posts, read 51,199,205 times
Reputation: 28314

Advertisements

I pay more in both with this calculator. I pay $58 more on the House and only $8 more on the Senate. That's on a roughly 150K income, older dependents. The new standard deduction and rates simply do not offset the loss of the exemptions and deductions I take.

This calculator also overestimates the amount I pay in state taxes so doesn't get my deductions right or the so-called savings. Assuming it correctly calculates the Trump tax, then I will pay about $1000 more under either plan based on my actual taxes from 2015.

I would advise everyone to compare the amount the calculator says you will pay with what you actually earned and paid in 2015 or 2016 and take the "you saved" number with a grain of salt until you have done that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:22 AM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,895 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
Well to a socialist less taxes is viewed as robbing the government
Senator Sanders is no ideologue. He, like most Americans, prefers a reality-based approach to solving problems:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:27 AM
 
29,444 posts, read 14,623,440 times
Reputation: 14420
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
You guys are so giddy on how much money you will get back. Yet the chip program will probably cease to exist because republicans say there is no funding for it. 9 million kids losing healthcare while corporations get so many tax breaks. It's heartless.

I agree , it is heartless. And I'm not completely happy with how the corporations are getting breaks. But as far as the CHIP program, it has run out of money. What do you propose ? Print up some more ? Force the corporations to pay for it ? Force us to pay for it ? Hell, my wife and I are having a hard enough time paying for our own healthcare.


The problem is our government (both parties) has allowed the healthcare corporations to get too big by allowing merger after merger, which as caused the prices of care to escalate. I've heard that the profits on these companies are only 4% , which seems fair , but 4% of a multi billion dollar a year company now becomes huge. I just read an article that the CEO of CVS is going to clear 500 million off the merger with Aetna. It's a huge catch 22. These companies have shareholders that want to see profits, yet those same shareholders make up our population. How do we stop it ? I agree, single payer does sound good, but I feel in the end might not be as good as we think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,861 posts, read 26,482,831 times
Reputation: 25754
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
yup, that sounds about right. I'll get a trivial tax cut of a few thousand dollars, in exchange for $1.5 trillion added to the national debt and the destabilization of Medicare.
I'm glad to see you so concerned about the debt. Considering we've added nearly $10 trillion dollars to the debt over the past 8 years, I'm sure you would support a repeal of one of the main drivers of that-Obamacare. Right? Call your senator.

Congratulations on having an income where a few thousand dollars is trivial to you. Now if you feel guilty about your "trivial" "few thousand dollar" gain in income due to lower taxes-I'm sure you can write a check to the US treasury to make you feel better. On the other hand-I'm sure there are an awful lot of people for whom a few thousand dollars is not trivial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Former land of plenty
3,212 posts, read 1,651,114 times
Reputation: 2017
Wake me up when we have the final tax bill calculator. I get one from turbo tax every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:37 AM
 
29,444 posts, read 14,623,440 times
Reputation: 14420
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheyenne2134 View Post
Also they are trying to limit deductions on houses with loans higher than 500k, you can’t even get a condo in nyc for 500k

Which is far beyond the reach of a middle class person. You mentioned the estate tax. From what I've read, it doesn't start until the estate reaches $5.5 million. Again, seems to effect the rich more than the middle class.


Now I do agree with you, I wanted to see more breaks for small businesses. And only breaks for large corporations that concentrate their operations and profits here in the states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:39 AM
 
29,444 posts, read 14,623,440 times
Reputation: 14420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
People with compassion may care...

I know that’s hard for some to believe.
Compassion doesn't fund the program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,861 posts, read 26,482,831 times
Reputation: 25754
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Senator Sanders described the 'values' being debated here:



Sanders: This Tax Bill Will Be Remembered As One Of The Greatest Robberies In American History

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...n_history.html
I'm confused...wasn't Obamacare written to address the health care problem and ensure that every American had health insurance? The Democrats tout it's success and whine and complain about ANY change to that program. Why, exactly, are these other programs even needed if Obamacare is actually doing as Democrats say? Or are you saying Obamacare is a failure and we need some other programs (Medicaid, CHIP, etc) to actually do as it was sold to the American public to do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:43 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,719,635 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I'm glad to see you so concerned about the debt. Considering we've added nearly $10 trillion dollars to the debt over the past 8 years, I'm sure you would support a repeal of one of the main drivers of that-Obamacare. Right?
Fake news. The national debt was driven up primarily by defense spending and two wars.


Quote:
Congratulations on having an income where a few thousand dollars is trivial to you. Now if you feel guilty about your "trivial" "few thousand dollar" gain in income due to lower taxes-I'm sure you can write a check to the US treasury to make you feel better. On the other hand-I'm sure there are an awful lot of people for whom a few thousand dollars is not trivial.
So in other words, all that posturing about "the budget deficit" and "the national debt" from Republicans was just one big lie?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 06:45 AM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,895 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Which is far beyond the reach of a middle class person. You mentioned the estate tax. From what I've read, it doesn't start until the estate reaches $5.5 million. Again, seems to effect the rich more than the middle class.


Now I do agree with you, I wanted to see more breaks for small businesses. And only breaks for large corporations that concentrate their operations and profits here in the states.
Agree the US would be better served if there were pragmatic objectives as the main goal of tax reforms.

As for bold, plans for tax reforms tied to wage increases, creating jobs for American people, 'repatriation' of capital held offshore, closed loopholes, etc. were proposed.

& were quickly dismissed. Some folks feel entitled to the 'No strings attached' approach. After all, that's worked out so well for them for going on 3 or 4 decades now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top