Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2017, 09:54 PM
 
21,109 posts, read 13,564,537 times
Reputation: 19723

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddo View Post
Are you sure? I have to wonder if this incident might cause some other thug to think twice and not attempt a robbery he was planning. If so, lives might have been saved indirectly because this particular thug got shot.
That's the hope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2017, 09:56 PM
 
21,109 posts, read 13,564,537 times
Reputation: 19723
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Or it could cause a thug to be more fearful in a holdup (and be quicker to shoot the people he is robbing if they make any sudden movements.)
They are usually not out to commit murder. They usually want not to shoot. Just for the gun to ensure demands are met and make a quick getaway to buy their drugs or whatever they want the money for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2017, 10:03 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Don't mess with Texans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 01:27 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddo View Post
If about 20% of the population were armed he wouldn't get very far in that holdup, and he would know that. Unless he was on a suicide mission he would choose something else to do that day.
"The latest report says 6.06% of the adult population now has a concealed carry permit. But these numbers may underestimate the rate of carry because 11 states no longer require a permit (these are called “constitutional carry” states)."

"It’s probably safe to say that 90% of Americans don’t carry a gun.

https://www.quora.com/What-percentag...-one-regularly


"But During President Obama’s administration, the number of concealed handgun permits has soared to over 14.5 million – a 215% increase since 2007."

"In ten states, more than 10% of adults have concealed handgun permits. Indiana has the highest rate — 15%. South Dakota is close behind with 14.7%."

https://crimeresearch.org/2016/07/ne...umber-permits/


Indiana and South Dakota are close to having that 20% carry rate with about 15% of their population carrying a gun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 01:38 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by swilliamsny View Post
This particular statistic of how much more likely you are to have the gun used against you, blah, blah, blah, was found to have been fudged quite a while ago. I forget exactly what methodology was used and how the numbers were compiled, but it was debunked long ago. That Mother Jones continues to use old, non-factual reports to further an agenda, means you should question whether anything gun related that they print is accurate.
Do you believe a gun in the American population is more likely to do A. or B.?

A. Shoot a criminal.

B. Accidentally shoot a friend or family member, accidently shoot a child who is playing with the gun, accidently shoot someone who was thought to be a criminal, shoot someone in a hunting accident, be used to commit suicide, kill someone in a argument, kill someone in a robbery, be used to kill ones spouse, be used to kill ones coworkers, be used to kill opposing gang members, be used in a mass murder.

Last edited by chad3; 12-09-2017 at 01:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 07:39 AM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,332,443 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Do you believe a gun in the American population is more likely to do A. or B.?

A. Shoot a criminal.

B. Accidentally shoot a friend or family member, accidently shoot a child who is playing with the gun, accidently shoot someone who was thought to be a criminal, shoot someone in a hunting accident, be used to commit suicide, kill someone in a argument, kill someone in a robbery, be used to kill ones spouse, be used to kill ones coworkers, be used to kill opposing gang members, be used in a mass murder.
B. But the question is irrelevant.

B is a stupid reason to collect America's guns. Just like with the subject of this thread, with guns removed from America THAT THUG WOULD HAVE STILL USED A GUN IN THAT ATTEMPTED ROBBERY! Except that he would still be alive, poised for the next robbery, and innocent people might be dead.

The majority of the people you listed in B would have still killed or caused their mayhem even if they had no gun. If someone wants to kill someone they will find a way to do it. You can't ban everything that is capable of killing. The gun-free Utopia you seek DOES NOT EXIST.

On the other hand, if over the last 50 years trained, armed citizens were in the schools, theaters, churches, and all the other gun free zones, the number of people saved from crazed gunmen committing mass murders is staggering.

If you want to try to make a point, please at least make a relevant one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 07:46 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well in this case yes but there has also been times where others have chosen to not take action for good reason, it may endanger others. Each situation is different and sometimes it turned out for the worse. Businesses certainly don't want employees getting involved, they are always told to let it go. Most felons just want the money, they are not interested in murder.
Yeah, a person pointing a gun at you to take your property wouldn’t think of being a bad person and shooting you. They are merely doing their jobs as responsible employees in the thug industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 07:52 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Do you believe a gun in the American population is more likely to do A. or B.?

A. Shoot a criminal.

B. Accidentally shoot a friend or family member, accidently shoot a child who is playing with the gun, accidently shoot someone who was thought to be a criminal, shoot someone in a hunting accident, be used to commit suicide, kill someone in a argument, kill someone in a robbery, be used to kill ones spouse, be used to kill ones coworkers, be used to kill opposing gang members, be used in a mass murder.
How many people have life insurance at this moment?

How many of those people are going to die this moment?

There are 300 million guns in the US. If 1 out of a 1,000 accidentally kill someone each year, we’d have 300,000 people accidentally killed by guns each year. It seems the odds of accidentally being killed are incredibly low. But that’s just math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 08:00 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Too bad permission has to asked from the overlords to carry a gun on your person or in your car. Anyone who wants to carry, should be able to carry, no questions asked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2017, 08:04 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Too bad permission has to asked from the overlords to carry a gun on your person or in your car. Anyone who wants to carry, should be able to carry, no questions asked.
There is at least one exception I can think of.

If you are sentenced to 20 years in prison for a crime and the state is making a deal with you to release you 5 years early, they can have no gun as part of that deal for the next five years. As a convict, you can refuse the offer, do your full 20’and then have a gun after you’ve done your full time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top