Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2017, 03:49 PM
 
2,924 posts, read 1,587,826 times
Reputation: 2498

Advertisements

Given how the USSR-styled courts act every time Trump and his administration do something the Deep State doesn't approve of, i predict some stinking Communist liberal judge will strike down the strike down of "net neutrality", pulling some "logic" out of his a-- as to how it's "unconstitutional" what the FCC did.

They did it to the travel ban, the reversing of the tranny ban, etc. I would NOT be surprised if the Stalinist kangaroo courts now tried to return "net neutrality" by judicial fiat.

 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,900 posts, read 3,900,192 times
Reputation: 5856
Net Neutrality is a huge win for corporate America and Trump's corporate lackeys.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,177 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14899
You'll understand when your ISP slows your data rate to 1 meg per day and it's slower than dialup used to be, unless you want the Platinum Package Upgrade for $19.95/month.

By then, however, it will be too late.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:20 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,140,056 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
Given how the USSR-styled courts act every time Trump and his administration do something the Deep State doesn't approve of, i predict some stinking Communist liberal judge will strike down the strike down of "net neutrality", pulling some "logic" out of his a-- as to how it's "unconstitutional" what the FCC did.

They did it to the travel ban, the reversing of the tranny ban, etc. I would NOT be surprised if the Stalinist kangaroo courts now tried to return "net neutrality" by judicial fiat.
Have fun viably accessing this site to spaz out on while you still can.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:28 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
You'll understand when your ISP slows your data rate to 1 meg per day and it's slower than dialup used to be, unless you want the Platinum Package Upgrade for $19.95/month.

By then, however, it will be too late.
How was it 3 years ago? You do understand that this law was a 2015 law, yes? Obviously not...
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:28 PM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,400,201 times
Reputation: 9438
You haven't a clue what "deep state" is or means.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:30 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,097,165 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
How was it 3 years ago? You do understand that this law was a 2015 law, yes? Obviously not...
The ISPs started throttling the year before NN was adapted, so they already have a history throttling.

Netflix has already raised their price no doubt in anticipation of the ISPs charging them to not have their content throttled.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 04:37 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,705,684 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandsthetime View Post
Net Neutrality is a huge win for corporate America and Trump's corporate lackeys.
Wrong, either way we lose. You have no clue that corporate US benefits regardless. There is no consumer protection in these rules.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 05:17 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
How was it 3 years ago? You do understand that this law was a 2015 law, yes? Obviously not...
The same as it was now, the internet has operated under the net neutrality principle for the last 20+ years, that is fact.

Here is one example of when it didn't and why those rules were formalized under Obama:


Quote:
AT&T, SPRINT and VERIZON: From 2011–2013, AT&T, Sprint and Verizon blocked Google Wallet, a mobile-payment system that competed with a similar service called Isis, which all three companies had a stake in developing.
I'm no fan of Obama but this is one thing they got right.
 
Old 12-20-2017, 05:19 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,910,517 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
How was it 3 years ago? You do understand that this law was a 2015 law, yes? Obviously not...
And I see you learned literally nothing from the previous threads on this topic. I don't know why so many people wasted so much time trying to explain it to you...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top