Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's not how standing works, it's unrelated to the merits of the case. Before the merits can be addressed, you need to have standing to sue.
I'm just curious as to who actually would have standing in this type of federal action. Not my area of expertise.
If there is no law violated, there would be nobody that meets this since nobody would have been harmed from an illegal action. Did you even read the emoluments clause? There is absolutely 100% no case to be had so it is impossible for anyone to show any standing.
That's not how standing works, it's unrelated to the merits of the case. Before the merits can be addressed, you need to have standing to sue.
I'm just curious as to who actually would have standing in this type of federal action. Not my area of expertise.
Probably Congress, on behalf of the American people, or so the article's characterization of the judge's position would lead one to believe.
Moderator cut: copyright violation
Last edited by Ibginnie; 12-23-2017 at 09:24 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
