Fusion GPS furious, drops bombshell that congress repubs are blocking investigation. (independent, elect)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why would a "DNC company" do business with members of the Republican party?
careful there, that kind of straight forward logic is too intense for some cult members here. It obvious to all outside of Trumpland that FUSION is a normal company being vilified solely to cover up for Trump.
the connections between Team Trump and Team Putin is simply stunning, the Right has given up refuting that and is attacking Fusion GPS in an attempt to discredit the source, but the fools did not know there where other sources already ...
Trump and his team never thought they would win, thus they did whatever they wanted with whoever they wanted because they thought it would never matter... They do not appear to have thought it through nor covered their tracks...
That op-ed and the whole discredited bunk about some aussie intelligence source kicking off the investigation are pure damage control trying to distract from whats important.
These clowns are claiming they didn't know about the Trump Jr meeting with the russian lawyer. That is not really credible since we know that they met with that same lawyer just before and just after that meeting. Furthermore, Rod Goldstone who is a Fusion associate is the guy who pushed to set the meeting up in the first place.
Exactly how are they in a position to know what started one of the most secretive FBI investigations ever launched?
These claims fly in the face of what several of their team members have been bragging about for the past year.
Even if you take the Papadopoulos claim as true, then the mere fact that Russia already had these emails and the first the Trump campaign learned about them was through Pap. would prove that Trump didn't collude with them to illegally obtain the emails. They already had them.
And if Papadopoulos was so central to the whole investigation, why is that the FBI didn't bother to seek warrants to spy on him? Instead they got them for Page.
How did the supposed aussie source start the investigation if by the time the FBI supposedly learned of it they had already filed for a FISA warrant and been rejected?
NYT and others have pushed for almost year that the Page meeting was what kicked off this investigation. That info came from the dossier. In fact, CNN published a report last year that the dossier was in fact used to obtain the FISA warrant.
Since then we learn that this dossier was nothing more than a smear campaign paid for by Clinton. Now realizing how problematic it is to use that dossier to obtain a warrant, they are trying to change their own narrative and suddenly poof! its Papadopoulos, nevermind what they have been saying for the past year.
The real problem is that this new Papadopoulos angle doesn't fit the timeline or narrative they have already established under oath.
Meanwhile we have now FBI documents that show that the sheer volume of classified material Clinton and her cronies where mishandling is evidence in itself of multiple crimes. Also learning that destruction of evidence after it was subpoenaed was completely ignored and swept under the rug by the FBI. Also the decision to exonerate her was made before a dozen witnesses were interviewed, including Clinton herself, and before much of the subpoenaed info had been delivered.
Try and spin that timeline all you want. We will see in the end what is what.
Most of their report corroborated what the FBI was already investigating, they have professional investigators.
Why hasn't Grassley released their testimony, he wont even answer any questions regarding the transcript.
No matter how much you push for the release of transcripts, it still a red herring.
Whatever Fusion said is irrelevant, all that matters is the question of whether or not was the dossier used to obtain FISA warrants, or to launch the Russian investigation.
The Fusion GPS transcripts cannot answer those questions, only the FBI/DOJ can, and they are refusing to answer, even when subpoenaed.
No matter how much you push for the release of transcripts, it still a red herring.
Whatever Fusion said is irrelevant, all that matters is the question of whether or not was the dossier used to obtain FISA warrants, or to launch the Russian investigation.
The Fusion GPS transcripts cannot answer those questions, only the FBI/DOJ can, and they are refusing to answer, even when subpoenaed.
NOPE NOPE NOPE.
that is what is important to YOU, because you desperate to try to discredit Mueller's investigation by any means you can.
BUT HARD LUCK , you failed. Your Dossier bull has been debunked and the Aussies back it up. Tough luck try going after something else. maybe you could argue Mueller is too white and that is unfair to Trump, or that Mueller is too Republican and that is unfair to Trump?
just keep throwing mud maybe you will finally get something to stick.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
