Wolff's book about the Trump White House - Merged threads (biased, amendment)

[wrecking ball]

Sloppy Steves:

like Sloppy Joes, just substitute BS for ground beef.

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

sloppy steves:

Like sloppy joes, just substitute bs for ground beef.

lol!!!

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by McGowdog

He has all kinds of sources to cite the validity of his claims.

wolff claims to have recordings of most of his interviews.

i think this is the reason kelly banned personal phones from the west wing last week.

[PilgrimsProgress]

Originally Posted by Hesychios

Keep spinning like that you're gonna get dizzy.

So you are saying Wolff was 'spinning' when he said he didn't know if anything he wrote in his own book was true? Interesting.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

So you are saying Wolff was 'spinning' when he said he didn't know if anything he wrote in his own book was true?

he didn't write that:


"Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.
"Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true."

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

So you are saying Wolff was 'spinning' when he said he didn't know if anything he wrote in his own book was true? Interesting.

Come on now, PP.

You got some 'splainin to do.

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

So you are saying Wolff was 'spinning' when he said he didn't know if anything he wrote in his own book was true? Interesting.

No. The point is that Wolff is claiming to accurately report what was said to him. And the further point is that this means that the WH staff is full of backbiters and/or liars.

Interesting that you don't get Wolff's plain English explanation.

[fibonacci]

What happened to the hardcore right constantly championing The Constitution and the very first Amendment this country was built on? Should Trump be allowed to throw it in the trash?

Donald Trump suggests he wants US law to limit free speech in wake of publication of explosive new book | The Independent


Fake news right?

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Originally Posted by Oakformonday

This just sums it about about just right!

On the nose, it is.

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by fibonacci

What happened to the hardcore right constantly championing The Constitution and the very first Amendment this country was built on? Should Trump be allowed to throw it in the trash?

Donald Trump suggests he wants US law to limit free speech in wake of publication of explosive new book | The Independent


Fake news right?

Neither team wants freedom of speech.

The sooner you folks realize that the sooner we can all be free.