Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All he has to do is show a connection between any of the indictees and anyone in the Trump campaign, such as Don Jr., which may not be as difficult as you think. If no Americans were indicted along WITH the Russians, there is a solid reason for that.
Yes, Rosenstein said there were no Americans knowingly involved, that is a pretty solid reason not to indict any Americans.
All he has to do is show a connection between any of the indictees and anyone in the Trump campaign, such as Don Jr., which may not be as difficult as you think. If no Americans were indicted along WITH the Russians, there is a solid reason for that.
Rosenstein said no members of the Trump admin or any Americans at all for that matter, knowingly worked with the Russians in this case.
Yes, Rosenstein said there were no Americans knowingly involved, that is a pretty solid reason not to indict any Americans.
Why peddle such an easily verifyable lie? If you’re going to use falsehoods to support your arguments, at least try to make them less glaring. You’re not even trying, for chrissakes
"Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity."
That does not mean that no American was involved, it simply means that none were implicated in these indictments. That also does not mean that there will not be further indictments forthcoming that will name others, including Americans.
What he said was that no Americans were charged. More indictments are coming to cover the Americans' involvement.
I think you have selective hearing.
He absolutely said no Americans were intentionally involved and that they had hired Americans.
13 Russian trolls, that phished more than one persons identity.
Why peddle such an easily verifyable lie? If you’re going to use falsehoods to support your arguments, at least try to make them less glaring. You’re not even trying, for chrissakes
Posts of the loyal opposition have been sadly lacking of late.
The least they could do is give us something to go on besides goofy lies, recycled conspiracy tales, and intermittent announcements that Obama, Clinton, Comey, Mueller, Bugs Bunny, and who knows who else are headed to prison.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
