Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:41 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
1,074 posts, read 949,299 times
Reputation: 467

Advertisements

George W. Bush and Dick Cheney won 62 million votes in 2004, with 50% of the vote. They are the LAST Republicans to win the popular vote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...election,_2004

Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
2,294 posts, read 2,660,936 times
Reputation: 3151
That is also the only time a Republican has won the popular vote in the last six presidential elections. That means Bush is the only GOP candidate to win the popular vote since 1988, and Bush only did it once.

That's crazy.

In 30 years (32 by the time the next presidential election is held), only once has the GOP candidate won the popular vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:46 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,176,191 times
Reputation: 55003
So let me get this straight... after 2004 there has only been 1 Republican in office and he did not get the popular vote.

So did he win the majority of States and get sworn in as President?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:46 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,354 posts, read 60,546,019 times
Reputation: 60938
Until 1992 Carter was the last Democrat to win the popular vote. Until 1968 Eisenhower was the last Republican to win the popular vote. Until 1960 Truman was the last Democrat to win the popular vote.

Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:47 PM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,226,939 times
Reputation: 6665
Because we have a genius system in place to protect us from mob rule. That way less populated states have a voice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:47 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,095,361 times
Reputation: 6842
California
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:49 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,176,191 times
Reputation: 55003
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
California
Just think, if CA and NY had 10 million more votes for Hillary, Trump would still be President.

Sounds good to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:50 PM
 
3,674 posts, read 8,660,588 times
Reputation: 3086
Well, it's OK to ignore the popular vote when the millions of voters being ignored are Californians. Their votes shouldn't determine the election because something something rural states something something.

When the exact opposite occurs, then it's totally OK that millions of people are being completely disenfranchised because, well, hell if I know. It isn't OK for a majority to win, but it's absolutely fine if a majority loses to a minority in this democracy as long as they voted Republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,362 posts, read 19,143,696 times
Reputation: 26249
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo3000 View Post
George W. Bush and Dick Cheney won 62 million votes in 2004, with 50% of the vote. They are the LAST Republicans to win the popular vote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...election,_2004

Why?
You're talking 3 elections...Obama was popular which is why he won the popular vote and Trump was/is hated by the media and establishment which is why he didn't win the popular vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2018, 08:00 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,354 posts, read 60,546,019 times
Reputation: 60938
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwine View Post
Well, it's OK to ignore the popular vote when the millions of voters being ignored are Californians. Their votes shouldn't determine the election because something something rural states something something.

When the exact opposite occurs, then it's totally OK that millions of people are being completely disenfranchised because, well, hell if I know. It isn't OK for a majority to win, but it's absolutely fine if a majority loses to a minority in this democracy as long as they voted Republican.
Then have a Constitutional Amendment introduced to change it.

And don't babble about the National Popular Vote Initiative. There is no way on God's green Earth that a Blue state like Maryland, or California, or Massachusetts, et al, will cast their Electoral votes for a Republican winning the national vote if the state votes Democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top