Bias of US media focus on subject of supposed Russian interference (Israel, illegal)

[golgi1]

When other foreign (and domestic) media were clearly doing the same thing for Hillary:

SIMONYAN: I can't deny that there could've been Russian media that had their opinion on Twitter, on Facebook, whatever broadcast. Is that bad? Is that illegal? Isn't that what the American media do as well?...British media supported Hillary. No problem with that. No interference. Nothing. French media supported Hillary. No problem with that. Some Russian media supported Trump – oh my God!

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/margari...michael-flynn/

[lisanicole1]

Russia is bad. French and English, good. They were smart. Their media was influencing the correct way by supporting the chosen one, the correct candidate. Russia was not.

[Ferd]

The same people that are outraged over Russian interference DEFEND Obama for dispatching his own crack political team to Israel for the express purpose of defeating the sitting Prime Minister (Bebe Netanyahu) AND PAYING FOR IT WITH TAX PAYER MONEY.


That happened and the left didn't care.shoot they think that was s m r t

[Tyster]

Originally Posted by Ferd

The same people that are outraged over Russian interference DEFEND Obama for dispatching his own crack political team to Israel for the express purpose of defeating the sitting Prime Minister (Bebe Netanyahu) AND PAYING FOR IT WITH TAX PAYER MONEY.


That happened and the left didn't care.shoot they think that was s m r t

It's worse than that. The Obama administration colluded with terrorist groups in Libya by giving them weapons to help them overthrow Qaddafi.