Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-10-2018, 02:10 PM
 
51,652 posts, read 25,813,568 times
Reputation: 37889

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
please explain how you can "find" someone else's emails.
This ought to be interesting.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2018, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosieSD View Post
Well, let's see. I find substantive evidence that a presidential candidate and/or his team may be breaking Federal law.

Do I:

1. keep quiet about it; it's none of my business
2. Go to the FBI and report it so the FBI and the DOJ can investigate further if they see fit.

Anyone who cares about the U.S. should choose #2.

-----snip----.
the problem is when you are paid to 'find' or even possibly lie about it

LIBERAL law firm Perkins Coie.... paid Fusion GPS (in April of 2016) -- which in turn hired left leaning former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele -- for the dossier(first 'reports' in june 2016...before the nomination)on behalf of its clients, the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, in a massive fascist liberal effort to undermine Trump (who didn't even have the nomination at the time).

now the guy who wrote the report...C. Steele... a left leaning former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele---of course Steele was lying... he is a far left liberal-----Steele, He was a president of the Cambridge Union and definitely left-wing and a 'confirmed socialist' as student ------Mr Steele was born in 1964 – and grew up in Surrey before attending Girton College, Cambridge, and becoming president of the Cambridge Union debating society in 1986 ..... Fellow students recall him as ‘avowedly Left-wing student with CND credentials’, and a ‘confirmed socialist’.-----------------and his former (deceased) wife...Mr Steele like himself described his late wife as ‘a liberal in every sense of the word and always on the progressive side of the argument’.



so what do we have here?.... but a witch hunt in search of a witch,


so the CLIENTS: Hillary and the DNC ... (who conspired against Bernie Sanders)

via the liberal law firm...... they hire ....

the slightly left leaning corporation of Fusion.... (who it turns out Fusion GPS, authors of the Trump-Russia garbage dossier paid three separate liberal journalists to spread the fake news of the Trump-Russia dossier).......they hire

a left leaning brit, (Steele) (with hatred of anything remotely conservative).......

.... all for opposition bashing....


the dossier shouldnt have ANY meaning....to anyone...

its a garbage, PAID FOR, made up dossier

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-s-thugs.html

Last edited by CaseyB; 01-10-2018 at 02:54 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
attempts to derail have failed your entire post is bs, everyone here knows it. THIS THREAD IS ABOUT FEINSTEIN not you made up bs. if you want to talk about your made up bs open a thread for it, i am sure plenty of cons will want to chant" lock her up "along with you.
and Feinstein has been a crooked idiot since back in the 70's

1981: The 1981 the Democrat controlled congress passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act which repealed the provisions of the National Mental Health Systems Act, cut federal mental health and substance abuse allocations by twenty-five percent, and converted them to block grants disbursed with few strings attached. New York State, which used block-grant monies to fund community-based programs, and other states have to cut mental health programs.

Mayor Dianne Feinstein (now a us senator) gathered religious leaders together in 1982 to discuss a shocking wave of homeless people on city streets.

The solution, they thought, was to temporarily set up cots and soup kitchens in a few church basements.

What they didn't realize then was they faced the genesis of a generational crisis brought on by complicated social factors out of their control.

At the time, Feinstein said, she thought homelessness was only a temporary problem, and the solution was to provide short-term housing.



so even back 40 years ago...Feinstein was a dimwit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Brusssels
1,949 posts, read 3,863,847 times
Reputation: 1921
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and Feinstein has been a crooked idiot since back in the 70's

1981: The 1981 the Democrat controlled congress passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act which repealed the provisions of the National Mental Health Systems Act, cut federal mental health and substance abuse allocations by twenty-five percent, and converted them to block grants disbursed with few strings attached. New York State, which used block-grant monies to fund community-based programs, and other states have to cut mental health programs.

Mayor Dianne Feinstein (now a us senator) gathered religious leaders together in 1982 to discuss a shocking wave of homeless people on city streets.

The solution, they thought, was to temporarily set up cots and soup kitchens in a few church basements.

What they didn't realize then was they faced the genesis of a generational crisis brought on by complicated social factors out of their control.

At the time, Feinstein said, she thought homelessness was only a temporary problem, and the solution was to provide short-term housing.



so even back 40 years ago...Feinstein was a dimwit
LOL, more wingnut smokescreen.

This is about the content of the transcripts, not who released it. And the contents spell real trouble for Trump and his cronies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 02:55 PM
 
1,199 posts, read 638,675 times
Reputation: 2031
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
please explain how you can "find" someone else's emails.
I'm pretty sure the missing e-mails were printed out and left in a stack of binders marked "Hillary's missing e-mails - NOT Confidential!... no seriously, for public consumption."


Trump was merely expressing his casual interest in the contents of those e-mails, just in case, you know, some enterprising and totally non-hackery Russian tourists happened to stumble across them while visiting the missing e-mail warehouse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 03:07 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,506,034 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xpat View Post
LOL, more wingnut smokescreen.

This is about the content of the transcripts, not who released it. And the contents spell real trouble for Trump and his cronies.
What in Simpson's testimony adds to the case against Trump ? Even the allegation that someone in the Trump campaign talked to the FBI might be false per CNN sources from FusionGPS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Brusssels
1,949 posts, read 3,863,847 times
Reputation: 1921
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
What in Simpson's testimony adds to the case against Trump ? Even the allegation that someone in the Trump campaign talked to the FBI might be false per CNN sources from FusionGPS.
Have you read it yet? Perhaps you should. He is in bed with a number of Russian organized crime figures, has laundered money for them, and he used Russian help to get dirt on his opponent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 03:23 PM
 
1,400 posts, read 863,606 times
Reputation: 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
it does when you are using said testimony to attack those who testified.

can you understand that? Grassley was openly and aggressively attacking FUSION and Steele. Grassley went as far to request charges be brought against Steele.


So YES grassley, Nunes , graham were delighted to use the testimony to smear an innocent man, thus releasing that information to expose the lies of the GOP members is the right thing to do.

and what is more you KNOW IT, you don't like it, but you know it.
You are drawing a lot of conclusions based on limited information. We simply don't have all the facts. It's fun to try and fit all the pieces together, but we are all speculating. I don't know anything. I'm merely raising questions. We don't really know the motivations of anyone involved. I believe very little of what the MSM (including FOX) tells us. The more that gets reported, the more questions I have. Contrary to what others have posted here, Steele retired from the MI6 in 2009. He was definitely not an active agent at the time the dossier was produced. So again, how does he know that the FBI had an informant in the Trump campaign? Pappadopoulos makes no sense, because he was the one that was supposedly trying to convince the campaign to meet with Russians. Unless of course Pappadopoulos was planted by the (insert your favorite acronym) to set up Trump. But that really doesn't make sense to me. Why would he have spouted off like that in a London bar to the Australian. So my best guess is that Steele is either a liar, or he was fed bad information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 03:51 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,747,294 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xpat View Post
LOL, more wingnut smokescreen.

This is about the content of the transcripts, not who released it. And the contents spell real trouble for Trump and his cronies.
No, they really don't. I see nothing new here. What specifically do you think "spells trouble"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2018, 03:53 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,370,877 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
please explain how you can "find" someone else's emails.
The same way you find anything else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top