Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Assange is not really the UK's concern, we should just let him go as far as I am concerned.
What is our concern is the Ecuadorian Embassy in London which needs to be closed and it's diplomats sent home, and if need be also cut off diplomatic relations. Indeed this is what should have happened years ago.
We can not have Foreign Embassies over ruling British Courts and harbouring people wanted on bail.
Last edited by Brave New World; 01-12-2018 at 07:02 AM..
Manning releases docs to Assange and dude is a hero for publishing it.
Assange publishes docs showing Hillary to be an evil dirtbag and he needs to "face the music"
Isn't that special.
That could also be spun the other way.
Assange releases classified docs potentially undermining US military and intelligence, execute him.
Assange releases documents showing Hillary in a bad light, atta boy give him a medal.
Assange is not really the UK's concern, we should just let him go as far as I am concerned.
What is our concern is the Ecuadorian Embassy in London which needs to be closed and it's diplomats sent home, and if need be also cut off diplomatic relations. Indeed this is what should have happened years ago.
We can not have Foreign Embassies over ruling British Courts and harbouring people wanted on bail.
The Law wasn't unjust, he was wanted for questioning by the Swedish under a European Arrest Warrant in accodance with European Law and Assange was given leave to applly all the way to the UK Supreme Court. In 2012, the UK Supreme court ruled that Sweden’s extradition request was lawful, European Law taking precedent over UK law in such circumstances.
Assange was released on Bail by the UK Courts, even though he could have been remanded in prison in relation to a criminal extradition for an extremely serious offence. It shoud be noted that if you are allowed to be released in such circumstances you have to adhere to strict bail conditions.
Not adhering to bail conditions is a matter for the Court, the maximum penalty being 1 year imprisonment.
Assange fears that if he is detained then an extradition warrant would be presented by the US Authorities, however this would nce again be subject to the UK courts.
Extradition is not automatic, however the UK is sympathetic to western allies requests, and we have legislation in relation to European Arrest Warrants and US/UK extradition.
Last edited by Brave New World; 01-12-2018 at 10:19 AM..
The Law wasn't unjust, he was wanted for questioning by the Swedish under a European Arrest Warrant in accodance with European Law and Assange was given leave to applly all the way to the UK Supreme Court. In 2012, the UK Supreme court ruled that Sweden’s extradition request was lawful, European Law taking precedent over UK law in such circumstances.
Assange was released on Bail by the UK Courts, even though he could have been remanded in prison in relation to a criminal extradition for an extremely serious offence. It shoud be noted that if you are allowed to be released in such circumstances you have to adhere to strict bail conditions.
Not adhering to bail conditions is a matter for the Court, the maximum penalty being 1 year imprisonment.
Assange fears that if he is detained then an extradition warrant would be presented by the US Authorities, however this would nce again be subject to the UK courts.
Extradition is not automatic, however the UK is sympathetic to western allies requests, and we have legislation in relation to European Arrest Warrants and US/UK extradition.
The phony rape charges are nothing but a deep state attempt to take down Julian Assange for exposing their misdeeds. Read up on what actually happened, in regards to the original charges being dropped, Assange's willingness to speak to Swedish police, US intervention, the new prosecutor, charges be picked back up, refusals to meet with Assange or his attorney, his trip to the UK, his willingness to meet with police in the UK and only after realizing it was a US deep state set-up in retaliation did he take asylum. There never was a rape. That would have been clear once he was taken into custody in Sweden, but the goal was never to try him for rape, it was for Sweden to drop those charges, but hand him over to the US on treason charges. That's why Assange took solice in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
e The 