Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2018, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15641

Advertisements

I would rather see an article with a respected economist predictions rather than some anonymous survey by the WSJ. Most do predict solid growth of just under 3 % and that is a good thing but we will see if this holds true, better to wait until the end of 2018 to judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2018, 02:48 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
I accessed off of Drudge, which I can do for most paywall sites, in addition to going in through the various realclear tabs, markets, policy, politics, investigations, religion, world, so on and so on. There is generally still a monthly limit, but it does enable me to access a number of sites I could not otherwise. You are welcome.
I use incognito and type the specific link

I did find the article but the article didn't tell me much about what i was looking for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:05 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,064,273 times
Reputation: 3884
What, exactly were you looking for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
I use incognito and type the specific link

I did find the article but the article didn't tell me much about what i was looking for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:08 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,064,273 times
Reputation: 3884
So, we can expect no more more negative or sourpuss comments from you when a bonus or across the board raise is announced with the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act is credited? That is, until 2018 is in the books.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I would rather see an article with a respected economist predictions rather than some anonymous survey by the WSJ. Most do predict solid growth of just under 3 % and that is a good thing but we will see if this holds true, better to wait until the end of 2018 to judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:10 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
What, exactly were you looking for?
Like I said a few posts ago, I'm looking for the names (and hopefully organizations) of the economists that were surveyed.

I want to get a feel for whether they're legit, i.e. an intellectually diverse group of people, or whether it's just a bunch of 50 right-wing talking heads that the WSJ keeps around.

I didn't get a clear answer on that bc I couldn't figure out the composition of the survey members.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:39 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,064,273 times
Reputation: 3884
No more spoon feeding of information. You will find some of the names here. https://www.finder.com/wsj-economic-survey.

Yahoo weighs in on the relative accuracy of the WSJ panel in 2017. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/econo...051600320.html

You know it is kind of hard to have a real conversation when someone betrays a bias in their wording, like you do..."or whether it's just a bunch of 50 right-wing talking heads that the WSJ keeps around." Might want to think about that attitude. Yeah, I'm bracing you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Like I said a few posts ago, I'm looking for the names (and hopefully organizations) of the economists that were surveyed.

I want to get a feel for whether they're legit, i.e. an intellectually diverse group of people, or whether it's just a bunch of 50 right-wing talking heads that the WSJ keeps around.

I didn't get a clear answer on that bc I couldn't figure out the composition of the survey members.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:41 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
No more spoon feeding of information.
You have provided no information about what I'm looking for, so pretending you've "spoon fed" anything is just you being ridiculous. Anyway, I don't think the information is available to the public or I would've found it the first time I looked.

Quote:
You will find some of the names here. https://www.finder.com/wsj-economic-survey.

Yahoo weighs in on the relative accuracy of the WSJ panel in 2017. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/econo...051600320.html
That tells me nothing about what I want to know, but thanks for trying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:46 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,142,059 times
Reputation: 8224
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post


Actually, no, traditionally the first year or so of a presidency, the economy is the residue of the predecessor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 03:47 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,064,273 times
Reputation: 3884
I just gave you eight or nine names from their December survey. They don't change. This is a monthly survey, You didn't take much time to reach you predetermined response. Got no time for this. 8-9 names, organization how they fared on consensus, third party take. But, nooooo, opie knows more. Right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
You have provided no information about what I'm looking for, so pretending you've "spoon fed" anything is just you being ridiculous. Anyway, I don't think the information is available to the public or I would've found it the first time I looked.



That tells me nothing about what I want to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2018, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15641
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
So, we can expect no more more negative or sourpuss comments from you when a bonus or across the board raise is announced with the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act is credited? That is, until 2018 is in the books.
If this elevates the disparity in middle class wages I will give credit, right now this is just speculation. Put the pom-poms down and lets see how this turns out, in the mean time I don't need to hear each company that gave out bonus checks as if this is new territory.


This is not a jobs act, no economist worth his weight has even remotely made that claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top