Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-12-2018, 11:27 AM
 
78,414 posts, read 60,593,823 times
Reputation: 49693

Advertisements

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...elopment_Index

Quote:
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators. A country scores higher HDI when the life expectancy at birth is longer, the education period is longer, and the income per capita is higher. It is used to distinguish whether the country is a developed, a developing or an underdeveloped country. The index was developed in 1990 by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq[3][4] and Indian economist Amartya Sen.
I think this is an interesting read given that it's from an independent source outside of American politics.

#1 is Norway.
#188 is Central African Republic

The methodology is reasonable and these metrics have been around since 1990.

It would seem to me that it does a reasonably good job of pointing out countries that are more and less developed than each other.

Does any agree or disagree with this report which has been ongoing now for almost 3 decades?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2018, 11:28 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Does any agree or disagree with this report which has been ongoing now for almost 3 decades?
It's a reasonable measurement of human development. It tends to be more favorable towards countries with high economic productivity and natural resources, and less favorable towards countries with large levels of re-distributive social spending (i.e. socialism).

In other words it leans more towards political conservatism than you'd normally expect from the UN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2018, 11:29 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,199 posts, read 7,225,101 times
Reputation: 17473
Watch Leftists now turn this racial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2018, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
It's a reasonable measurement of human development. It tends to be more favorable towards countries with high economic productivity and natural resources, and less favorable towards countries with large levels of re-distributive social spending (i.e. socialism).

In other words it leans more towards political conservatism than you'd normally expect from the UN.
Because when I think of political conservatism I think of Norway.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2018, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,759,397 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Does any agree or disagree with this report which has been ongoing now for almost 3 decades?
Is it more than a collection of data? What's to agree or disagree with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2018, 07:20 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283
It’s a pretty good index that seems very apolitical... it could be refined a bit with some extra apolitical measures to better separate countries within each tier...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top