Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is LEGAL immigration bad for the United States?
Yes 10 24.39%
No 31 75.61%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-14-2018, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,470 posts, read 4,067,453 times
Reputation: 4517

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
I thought automation was supposed to take away many of our jobs? Why do we still need a rapidly growing workforce if the workforce is going to be displaced by robots anyway? And what about overpopulation? Is that not a problem anymore?
Overpopulation, never was a problem those who believed in Thomas Malfus’s theory were lied to, take in mind the U.S could comfortable support a third of the population density of Great Britain by itself, which would be 1 billion people, and we are nowhere near that number. Especially as Technology moves along the planet could probably support 10+ billion people and the highest estimated I have seen for population is 11 billion people before it declines. I think every time someone has come along screaming overpopulation, another person has invented something that made the first guy look like an idiot. I believe this trend will keep going.

BBC - Earth - How many people can our planet really support?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2018, 05:12 PM
 
62,877 posts, read 29,110,011 times
Reputation: 18561
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigerianNightmare View Post
Overpopulation, never was a problem those who believed in Thomas Malfus’s theory were lied to, take in mind the U.S could comfortable support a third of the population density of Great Britain by itself, which would be 1 billion people, and we are nowhere near that number. Especially as Technology moves along the planet could probably support 10+ billion people and the highest estimated I have seen for population is 11 billion people before it declines. I think every time someone has come along screaming overpopulation, another person has invented something that made the first guy look like an idiot. I believe this trend will keep going.

BBC - Earth - How many people can our planet really support?
You couldn't be more wrong. You obviously don't know what it takes for a country to sustain a given population number. It's not just about land it's about providing water, ariable land to grow food on ,jobs and other natural and social resources while still having land for wildlife and open space. This is true for the entire world.


SUSPS - Support US Population Stabilization - Support a Comprehensive Sierra Club Population Policy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top