BREAKING: Newly Uncovered Financial Transactions in Trump-Russia Case Found, Mueller Investigating (impeachment, March)

[stburr91]

Originally Posted by Elliott_CA

You call two guilty pleas, two indictments and a grand jury subpoena a "dead end"?

Yes, it was a dead end from the beginning because there never was any Russian collusion.

A year and a half, and still not a single shred of evidence of any collusion.

This subpoena is just for headlines, just like the swat team raid on Manafort.

Every time the walls close in on Mueller, he pulls stunts, it isn't going to work, the Russian collusion story will be proven false.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by stburr91

Yes, it was a dead end from the beginning because there never was any Russian collusion.

A year and a half, and still not a single shred of evidence of any collusion.

This subpoena is just for headlines, just like the swat team raid on Manafort.

Every time the walls close in on Mueller, he pulls stunts, it isn't going to work, the Russian collusion story will be proven false.

remember the last exciting thread like this started by the OP?

Proof of Collusion Is Very Near: WikiLeaks Gave Trump Access to Stolen Data

[Jimmyp25]

Originally Posted by uggabugga

remember the last exciting thread like this started by the OP?

Proof of Collusion Is Very Near: WikiLeaks Gave Trump Access to Stolen Data

LOL. Next in the twilight zone. Trump colluded with Mcdonalds CEO to exclude minorities from making his big macs. Mueller says investigation underway......

[hbdwihdh378y9]

Originally Posted by sware2cod

Here's the answer. This is the same link from OP.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jasonleopol...JKx#.mgBxNrE54

The Treasury Department turned over the suspicious activity reports to the FBI after the bureau asked for records that might relate to the investigation into the election

That's not an answer.

[evilcart]

Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9

That's not an answer.

yes it is, prove it is not, or by the law of the internets you owe me four cats.

[hbdwihdh378y9]

Originally Posted by cttransplant85

So all we know is that buzzfeed and dailybeast is reporting that the Russian ambassador received money 10 days after the election? This is not news.

Moreover, he received it from a "Russian diplomatic account", according to the story. This stuff may all be true, but you're exactly right: It's not news. It's just a cheap headline to advance a bogus and malicious narrative.

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by greywar

Like...wishing for people to behave within the bounds of the law? Your argument is that we should be concerned if people are prosecuted for violating the law?

Do you think everyone is like so many who support Trump, where our chosen politician is more important then the laws? LOL.

no...I don't think everyone is so politically aligned ...but many are


I am in no way defending trump...as I have said many times...if he is wrong, he should resign/be impeached etc


but many people out there think if trumps goes away, automatically Hillary is the new winner.....and from observations, it seems like Obama/Hillary/podesta/lynch/Kerry, and even comey are up to their preverbal eyeballs in this.... so the true partisan lefties out there (not you my friend) may find that when trump goes down...many from the left side of things will fall with him....so my 'warning' is to be careful for what they wish for, because this web, has many, many strings

[BajanYankee]

"This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to f_____g Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr., and Jared Kushner . . . It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”

-Steve Bannon

[hbdwihdh378y9]

Originally Posted by Elliott_CA

You call two guilty pleas, two indictments and a grand jury subpoena a "dead end"?

Yeah, none of the charges you mentioned had anything to do with the campaign.

[sware2cod]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

many people out there think if trumps goes away, automatically Hillary is the new winner.

I had to check the calendar to see if it's April 1st. It's not. Why the tall tale then?