Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not FOX News. It was in the Nunes Memo. Black and white. I am starting to lose the respect I held for your posts regarding retirement/Social Security/Medicare. I am sure that is the source for your high numbers of rep points. Can't be here in P&OC.
Because nothing in the Nunes memo could be misleading or incomplete?
As if the entire "Russia sabotaged our election" is anything but.
The Dems would have us believe that some Facebook ads were enough to remove the informed free agency from American voters.
The memo points to facts. Whether or not you agree as to the weight of the facts is another story. However, they are facts nevertheless and are the only foundation of the argument.
Whereas the liberal narrative has as one of its primary pillars the assumption that the minds of American voters were compromised. This removes the free agency of those Americans.
That's a smear.
In this situation, liberals are accusing conservatives, who won an election, of what they are guilty of by a factor of 10x. It's an age old liberal strategy.
Russia may have run some ads. Investigate all you like. We do the same and more for foreign nations, and this will always continue for every nation that matters from here on out. Foreign nations will try to influence elections.
But when you transition from validating that occurred to demanding that the nation accepts that access to information corrupts the mind of American voters and thus the voting process, you are deeply into an Orwellian narrative that is excessively toxic to democracy.
Because you can't stand losing one election. That's what you are willing to sacrifice the foundation of public trust in the democratic process for. You lost, and so the mind's of the opposition were corrupt. Morons.
The Russia Investigation, founded on a specious truth or not, reads as entirely partisan to half of the nation.
No protest to the Conservative response to this partisan investigation, especially since its primary act is to point to the investigation's partisan nature, is going to play well given the investigation's partisan stench.
The only way out of this was for the Dems to accept their defeat. Given that they aren't, heads will roll whenever inestigative bias can be pointed to.
40 separate reasons were given to justify the Page FISA. The Steele dossier is one of those 40. Additionally....so what? Page has been called a minor player in all of this. I thought we would see something more damaging then this to be honest.
If you were a judge and someone brought all this to you for a warrant and you found out that a part of it, no matter how small, was actually a political hit piece that was fake, would you give them the warrant? If you would, please don't ever become a judge.
Last edited by Cruzincat; 02-02-2018 at 02:25 PM..
Reason: typo
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
