Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:30 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,323,715 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

From Politico Magazine -

"If, like me, you’ve been following every twist and turn of the Russia investigations, you’ve probably wrestled with the same question that has been gnawing at me for more than a year now: What if there’s nothing there?"

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...skeptic-217024

What if there’s nothing there? What if Democrats put this country through hell for nothing?

The whole Russian fairy tale has been so obviously stupid that it's fascinating watching the lefty MSM start to come to grips with mess they helped create. None of them ever asked, why would Trump need Putin’s help? None of it made any sense to me.

I get that it did to the left. The queen lost. It shattered a lot of realities and the only way for a lot of you to accept what happened was to declare Trump must've cheated.

But the truth is starting to come out now. Obama tried to fix the election and it backfired. Now Politico is trying to set the table by warning you all of what's coming next. Just look at Casey warning Mueller not to release his findings before the 2018 midterms. It certainly wasn't out of concern for GOP losses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:33 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,490,983 times
Reputation: 3981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
From Politico Magazine -

"If, like me, you’ve been following every twist and turn of the Russia investigations, you’ve probably wrestled with the same question that has been gnawing at me for more than a year now: What if there’s nothing there?"

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...skeptic-217024

What if there’s nothing there? What if Democrats put this country through hell for nothing?

The whole Russian fairy tale has been so obviously stupid that it's fascinating watching the lefty MSM start to come to grips with mess they helped create. None of them ever asked, why would Trump need Putin’s help? None of it made any sense to me.

I get that it did to the left. The queen lost. It shattered a lot of realities and the only way for a lot of you to accept what happened was to declare Trump must've cheated.

But the truth is starting to come out now. Obama tried to fix the election and it backfired. Now Politico is trying to set the table by warning you all of what's coming next. Just look at Casey warning Mueller not to release his findings before the 2018 midterms. It certainly wasn't out of concern for GOP losses.

Who runs the senate and house intelligence committee investigations? Republicans.
Claiming the FBI, NSA and CIA are also biased toward Democrats doesn't hunt either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:34 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,600,078 times
Reputation: 21097
Wow.

If the leftist Politico even doubts it, you know there is absolutely nothing on Trump.

IMO, this entire witch hunt will end up blowing up the Democrats, not Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:34 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,356,421 times
Reputation: 17261
I see lots of basis for obstruction. Not so much for collusion so far. But maybe Mueller will surprise us. But the obstruction of justice attempts seem quite clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:36 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,600,078 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
I see lots of basis for obstruction. Not so much for collusion so far. But maybe Mueller will surprise us. But the obstruction of justice attempts seem quite clear.
Yeah, the Democrats are going to end up burning for spying on the Trump campaign, using Hillary Clinton Research about Russians to justify warrants, and then trying to cover it up once they discovered they lost the election, bigly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:38 PM
 
Location: NE Atlanta Metro
3,197 posts, read 5,372,229 times
Reputation: 3196
GWU's Jonathon Turley believes it's going to be an issue like the payoff to Stephanie Clifford that will ultimately nail Trump.

We'll see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:39 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,092,467 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by First24 View Post
GWU's Jonathon Turley believes it's going to be an issue like the payoff to Stephanie Clifford that ultimately nails Trump.

We'll see.
stuff like that didn't nail Bill Clinton, why would it bring down Trump?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:40 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,971,928 times
Reputation: 4332
I don't remember where I saw it today, but I actually read that Kim Dot Com (questionable source already, I know) claims that the DNC "hack" wasn't even a hack, just an inside data theft job essentially. Apparently there is some analysis that shows the speed of which the data was transferred off the servers and they are speeds that were way too fast to have been accomplished from outside the network (ie. over seas) and was about the speed you would expect from a flash drive connected directly to the network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:41 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,446 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10430
Quote:
Originally Posted by First24 View Post
GWU's Jonathon Turley believes it's going to be an issue like the payoff to Stephanie Clifford that will ultimately nail Trump.

We'll see.
Nails him for what? For kafiddling with someone who wasn't his wife, before he was president?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2018, 02:41 PM
 
Location: NE Atlanta Metro
3,197 posts, read 5,372,229 times
Reputation: 3196
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
stuff like that didn't nail Bill Clinton, why would it bring down Trump?
What about John Edwards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top