Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Social Security Be Privatized?
Yes 30 23.08%
No 100 76.92%
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2018, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,259,424 times
Reputation: 19952

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebeldor View Post
Or just let people keep the fruits of their own hard labor and invest it in whichever way they deem fit. You know, pro-choice.
George Bush was promoting this big-time.

But when the economy came crashing down and so many people lost money as 401ks dropped precipitously, everyone started singing a different tune.

All of a sudden, it was "wow--glad that my entire retirement fund was not in a private account". It became a bad idea.

 
Old 02-27-2018, 03:53 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,976,365 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
George Bush was promoting this big-time.

But when the economy came crashing down and so many people lost money as 401ks dropped precipitously, everyone started singing a different tune.

All of a sudden, it was "wow--glad that my entire retirement fund was not in a private account". It became a bad idea.
Yeah, the catch 22 is that a huge number of American's are financially illiterate so they don't know how to prepare for the future, but they also are too scared to break away from SS into something that can be better for them long term because to them all of Wall St. = Bernie Madoff or the 2008 crash.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:04 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
You raise some very good points.

I myself like it when my Social Security statement arrives as it will be -in theory- a nice cherry on top of the sundae.

The only problem is that it is in the red and thus not viable for the long term.
It's not in that bad of shape. It just needs some adjustments, and there are a variety of relatively minor tweaks that will buy us many decades of solvency.

The perception that "Social Security is going under" is because some folks -- mainly politicians -- like to use the phrase "Social Security and Medicare." They lump them into one single idea, and Medicare is in much, much worse shape than SS.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:11 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmissary View Post
But then if you wind up broke and homeless, don't expect anyone to help you ...right?
That should already be true, anyway. No Federal spending on welfare. Only private charities. Let the people decide who deserves help. They can donate and vote with their wallets.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:12 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,220,557 times
Reputation: 12102
I said yes even though I really don’t care.

I don’t pay into SS.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:15 PM
 
2,924 posts, read 1,587,568 times
Reputation: 2498
Define "Privatized".


If you mean:

Still a federal program but run by private companies, no I don't. It would just lead to government-sanctioned corporate cronyism.


If you mean ending the federal program and letting several non-government run/related options, then yes.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
I said yes even though I really don’t care.

I don’t pay into SS.
How do you not pay into SS (unless you don't work)? That is tax evasion, which is a crime
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
The average annual return in the stock market since 1980 has been somewhere around 6.5%. Meanwhile, the rate of return for Social Security is around 1%. I would have been better off putting that money into a savings account.
According to the actuaries who crunch Social Security's numbers, the rate of return ranged from 0.04% to 9.19% per year, depending on your contributions, when you began receiving benefits and the length of time you received benefits.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
SS is neither illegitimate nor is it an investment.

The fact that you think it is supposed to be an investment is why you're so confused.
No doubt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
OK, so I stand corrected, the technical poverty level is less than SS, but SS alone still isn't a comfortable level of income in most parts of the country.
It is possible for someone to be eligible for Social Security benefits, yet receive only $28.97 per month in benefits, for an annual income of $347.75.

There are many seniors both single and married whose annual Social Security income is less than the federal poverty level not adjusted or less than the State poverty level.

Those persons are free to move to another locale where the Cost-of-Living is lesser.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
Social Security benefits should be means tested.
They are means-tested. You pay a tax on Social Security benefits if you earn more than $25,000 annually and are single. The means-test for married couples is $32,000.

Note that many wealthy individuals never bother to apply for Social Security benefits.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
It's not a "better" option, it's a different one, with a different purpose.

SS was never intended to maximize returns, it was intended to minimize risk.
Asking people with a Financial IQ of Zero or less to invest their money would result in disaster.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 05:09 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,220,557 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
How do you not pay into SS (unless you don't work)? That is tax evasion, which is a crime
Railroad workers are exempt. We have our own solvent system recognized by the fed.
 
Old 02-27-2018, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,122,032 times
Reputation: 1644
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Railroad workers are exempt. We have our own solvent system recognized by the fed.
lucky! probably get better retirement benefits also.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top