Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The National Geographic editor is criticizing history and making sure everyone believes that race doesn't exist but being ethnically Jewish definitely does exist. People like that ethnocentrism's and thinly veiled hostility toward everyone else not of their ethnicity is so transparent. I say her ethnicity doesn't exist then.
I look forward to renewing my almost 30 year subscription with nat geo....and oh wait, I have the digital CD set of every issue back over 100 years as well.
They're generally pretty fair on topics so I'm not surprised when really extreme political posters get triggered by their articles.
(Both left and right mind you)
Nor surprisingly, I'd put the OP on ignore a while back for their garbage.
Did you actually read through the articles, research scientists have a different definition regarding what we accept as race. It's not leftist, its science.
Science is the process of understanding the current state of human diversity and how it happened. Leftist science is proclaiming, "There's no scientific basis for race - it's a made up label" ...and then switching terms, using "populations" to mean the same thing as race.
Science is the process of understanding the current state of human diversity and how it happened. Leftist science is proclaiming, "There's no scientific basis for race - it's a made up label" ...and then switching terms, using "populations" to mean the same thing as race.
The scientists explain their definition regarding races, did you read the article. Why exactly is that a big deal, the article is extensive but you pulled out one statement in one article, if you look hard enough I guess you find reason to be insulted over anything. But I'm glad to see you like NG, its a great publication.
The scientists explain their definition regarding races, did you read the article. Why exactly is that a big deal, the article is extensive but you pulled out one statement in one article, if you look hard enough I guess you find reason to be insulted over anything. But I'm glad to see you like NG, its a great publication.
The new editor in her rampage also claims her identity (which apparently doesn't really scientifically exist) was a "victim of discrimination" in the past but demonstrates why that was justifiable. She's unfit to hold an influential position.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's the title of the article.
