Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:14 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,719,635 times
Reputation: 14745

Advertisements

Quote:
The big surge in the labor force is just not supposed to happen according to the new normalists—the secular stagnators who keep telling us a slow-growth economy is as good as it gets. It’s the same crew of former Obama economic advisers who say that we can’t enjoy robust growth in the labor force because too many Baby Boomers are retiring. But last month Americans weren’t listening.
You have to appreciate the snide, partisan remarks from an "unbiased" and "trusted" publication like the WSJ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:18 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,719,635 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Let me interpret this another way. There will be 800,000 more people paying income taxes. That will help the deficits and debt down the road.
You do realize that part of the reason labor markets are tight is because of more debt and deficits?

Why do you think we have so much debt in the first place? Because we're addicted to the short-term stimulus that newly created money provides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,692,117 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
You have to appreciate the snide, partisan remarks from an "unbiased" and "trusted" publication like the WSJ
I wonder if they had a similar opinion when the same approximate numbers were added that month in 2016.

I'm willing to bet they phrased it as some sort of anomaly.


Of course it is good news when jobs are added, if one believes the numbers.

I've yet to see anyone explain why they should be believed now after all of the talk during Obama's presidency and particularly during Trump's campaign about the numbers being fake.

Anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:32 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,719,635 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
I wonder if they had a similar opinion when the same approximate numbers were added that month in 2016.

I'm willing to bet they phrased it as some sort of anomaly.


Of course it is good news when jobs are added, if one believes the numbers.

I've yet to see anyone explain why they should be believed now after all of the talk during Obama's presidency and particularly during Trump's campaign about the numbers being fake.

Anyone?
If you google the author, he has nothing but hit pieces against the Democrats / propaganda pieces praising the republicans.

its not serious analysis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:44 AM
 
45,542 posts, read 27,152,040 times
Reputation: 23856
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
You do realize that part of the reason labor markets are tight is because of more debt and deficits?

Why do you think we have so much debt in the first place? Because we're addicted to the short-term stimulus that newly created money provides.
No - that's not why labor markets are tight. What does government debt have to do with a private company's hiring practices? Regulations hamper the labor market. Regulations that make it more expensive to hire employees. Regulations make it more favorable to move to another country because it is cheaper to operate.

We have debts and deficits because the government overspends. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:46 AM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,562,401 times
Reputation: 14388
But, but Hillary just said Trump didn't want women and blacks to have jobs. I'm confused. Can a man help me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 09:51 AM
 
1,323 posts, read 588,187 times
Reputation: 1063
Well Trump said all these stats are fake, so...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,863 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
So you are saying that it's not good news that 800K people have joined the labor force... ?
Of course it's good news, but that good news is nothing particularly unusual. It's just noise in the data. In some future months there will be another big down month, which will cancel out some of February's big rise. Pretty predictable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,863 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
I wonder if they had a similar opinion when the same approximate numbers were added that month in 2016.
I've actually been reading the WSJ for many years, and yes, there were plenty of times during Obama's tenure when they wrote articles of a similar tenor.

EDIT: That said, they are going to be particularly disappointed when they gradually learn the 'secular stagnationists' are right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2018, 11:05 AM
 
45,542 posts, read 27,152,040 times
Reputation: 23856
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Of course it's good news, but that good news is nothing particularly unusual. It's just noise in the data. In some future months there will be another big down month, which will cancel out some of February's big rise. Pretty predictable.
It the highest increase in a month in 35 years. You say it's no big deal. OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top