Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2018, 12:56 PM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,814 posts, read 34,678,989 times
Reputation: 10256

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
Because of the unfair AMT, I am never able to deduct things that non-AMT people have been able to deduct. So now that those deductions are not available to anybody, I didn’t take the hit that they did. Now that we are all in the same boat, I only see the positives from the lowering of th tax brackets rather than the negatives of losing deductions that I never had in the first place.

If I had my choice, we would ALL be able to have those deductions, but as long as I didn’t have them anyway, it is hard for me to be sympathetic with people who can no longer deduct things that I was never able to deduct in the first place.
They raised the bottom rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:00 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,058,815 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by G Grasshopper View Post
I have just been informed by my tax accountant that under the new tax law, my taxes will go up next year by about $1,200. I am a 65 year old widow living on pension and investments, but working a few hours per week. But unfortunately, I live in California, and as we all know, Californians have been singled out for punishment. I will lose most of my deductions, including my medical deductions, and the higher standard deduction will not cover the difference, apparently.

Just thought that those of you that are convinced that Trump has the best interest of Americans in mind might like to know that he did not have my best interests in mind. I know that some of you will say it is my own fault for living in a state with high taxes. But the duty of the Federal Government is to make sure that all Americans are treated fairly, regardless of the state and local policies where they live.
You will not lose your medical deductions. Unless your accountant means the standard deduction will be higher than the the allowed medical.

Quote:
All taxpayers who itemize their deductions would be able to write off qualifying medical expenses that exceed 7.5 percent of their adjusted gross income for tax years 2017 and 2018. After that, the threshold would return to the current 10 percent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:00 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,465 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
They raised the bottom rate. I'm glad that tax preparers are warning people. I think that doing away with the deductions for charitable contributions really says something about the mindset.
They didn’t do away with charitable deductions. They raised the standard deduction, so that most people will be deducting MORE under the standard deduction than they would if they itemized with the charitable deductions. People that still itemize can still deduct charitable contributions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:05 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,465 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
They raised the bottom rate.
I don’t think that is true. Can you show me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:06 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,058,815 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
They raised the bottom rate. I'm glad that tax preparers are warning people. I think that doing away with the deductions for charitable contributions really says something about the mindset.
Charitable contributions were not done away with at all. Many people will no longer claim them because the standard deduction is higher. If someone is itemizing the deduction is there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:18 PM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,814 posts, read 34,678,989 times
Reputation: 10256
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I don’t think that is true. Can you show me?
I'm posting with a phone. The bottom rate has gone from 10% to 12%. That's up in my book.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:22 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,058,815 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
They raised the bottom rate.
Not true according to this.
2017 vs. 2018 Federal IRS Tax Brackets, Tax Rates, Standard Deduction and Personal Exemption Updates
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:26 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,465 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
I'm posting with a phone. The bottom rate has gone from 10% to 12%. That's up in my book.
Nope. Bottom rate is still 10%. The 15% rate was lowered to 12%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:29 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,161,537 times
Reputation: 12992
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
In CA liberal politicians are wasting our tax money on things like hiring attorneys for illegal aliens and a high speed train for almost $100 billion ..
I've been in California rush hour traffic. The state needs as many trains as it can get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2018, 01:31 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,058,815 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl View Post
I've been in California rush hour traffic. The state needs as many trains as it can get.
That rush hour traffic is not what the high speed trains would address.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top