Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Antifa and BLM are just your boogeymen of the day. No - they are not a bigger threat than the Klan who most certainly have been emboldened by Trump.
You DO realize that the KKK is a Democrat group don't you?
Nothing has changed...the Democrats still hate blacks and want to keep them down...they just switched tactics....and blacks are finally waking up and seeing the truth.
ah yes, 'dog whistle,' where someone (usually a liberal) takes the words of someone (usually a conservative) and rewrites them to mean something other than what was said. A form of 'shoving words in their mouth.' It's always easy to win the debate when you get to dictate what both sides are saying. Not a very honest form of debate, however.
They did this with Reagan, too. He was often accused of using "states' rights" as a dog whistle for 'white supremacy.' I posted about this once, and proved it to be a baseless accusation.
Funny how they all claimed Reagan would be a Democrat if he were alive today. It's a hilarious thing watching them twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend their indefensible positions.
I see their "dog whistles" and raise them "virtue signaling, contradictory positions, blatant hypocrisy, and being unquestioning followers of the herd"... oops, I don't think they have enough of an honest bankroll to cover that bet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC1984
You DO realize that the KKK is a Democrat group don't you?
Nothing has changed...the Democrats still hate blacks and want to keep them down...they just switched tactics....and blacks are finally waking up and seeing the truth.
Not the rank and file Dems, but certainly the political class. Sad, but true.
All they did was switch from forced labor to perception for votes. Inner city blacks are still as dependent as ever, just the way the intolerant and exclusive democrat whites like it, while patting themselves on the back for doing absolutely nothing.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,548 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
Trump initially refused to denounce David Duke - claiming that ' he didn't know him" - another lie.
Your post is so full of spin that I'm only going to bother addressing one, not that much time in the day for all.
He did not "initially" refuse to denounce him, he denounced him numerous times. During that one week he was asked to denounce him almost daily, sometimes more than once a day. I don't blame him from walking away from that question in disgust. I was glad he did walk away from it, how many times should a person denounce another ... it's never enough for the left.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,548 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10468
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeliner
So according to YOUR logic, "fine people" can be members of the Klan, Neo-Nazis, or some Alt-Right white supremacist group.
Both the Klan and Nazis have long notorious roots of terror.
That's like saying, there are "fine people" who are members of ISIS...
No!
Fine people don't join terrorist groups or become their sympathizers!
In one of your prior posts you threw in some names, manafort, Flynn, etc.(are they even tied to supremacists? or were you just throwing names out there?) According to your logic, you're fine when some of those people worked in the obama admin, but suddenly not fine with it when Trump had taken them on
Did it bother you this much when hillary was snuggling with supremacists? For example .. not only worked for goldwater but said she was proud of it, giving byrd a big sloppy kiss, etc.
Yes at one time supremacists were a problem in this country, not so much these days. Heck, these days there's probably not even enough of them to fill a roadside Dixie Diner.
You people are so afraid of everyone, supermacists, Russians, the right, etc., and yet you're willing to give up your rights, and to the very man that you're claiming is hitler...LOL. A person couldn't make this chit up if they tried.
You DO realize that the KKK is a Democrat group don't you?
Nothing has changed...the Democrats still hate blacks and want to keep them down...they just switched tactics....and blacks are finally waking up and seeing the truth.
Do yourself a favor and google southern strategy. Then stick that tongue back in your mouth and educate yourself.
IF you are so delusional that you think the black voting bloc is now supporting Republicans - you really need to get out more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee
Your post is so full of spin that I'm only going to bother addressing one, not that much time in the day for all.
He did not "initially" refuse to denounce him, he denounced him numerous times. During that one week he was asked to denounce him almost daily, sometimes more than once a day. I don't blame him from walking away from that question in disgust. I was glad he did walk away from it, how many times should a person denounce another ... it's never enough for the left.
He ABSOLUTELY refused to denounce him initially. Please do not post lies.
It was an interview with Jake Tapper where Trump pretended he didn't know who David Duke was and he did not denounce him.
No, the answer to the question is NO! What are white supremists doing that have empowered them and how did Trump supposedly do that? You lefties have no shame, do you?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,548 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory
No, the answer to the question is NO! What are white supremists doing that have empowered them and how did Trump supposedly do that? You lefties have no shame, do you?
Yep. They are quick to throw out accusations but fail in answering those simple questions.
Do you really think that interview was the first time he was asked to disavow duke? Do you know what the word "initially" means? Obviously you do not.
He disavowed him when thinking about running in 2000, called him “a bigot, a racist, a problem.”,.
He had disavowed him over the years. In fact, he had disavowed duke 2 days before the tapper interview, it was why tapper had asked him about it.
Maybe you should bother to research before talking, and, not be so quick with the personal attacks...all due to your own failure.w
No!
Trump definitely back-pedaled on denouncing Duke!
He was afraid that he would upset his base in doing so. Racist don't categorically denounce one another...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
