Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are you really going to compare one off-hand comment to years of threats?
Her comment was ill-advised in the current political climate, but your buddy Ted has been saying much more inflammatory things for years.
How many times has Ted carried through with any of his threats? Zero?
So his track record is pretty poor.
The other person? What's their track record?
If someone makes regularly outrageous statements of intent but fails to act on any of them, then we know they're most likely empty claims. He's established a pattern of being a blowhard, with no action. Someone making the first such statement deserves far greater concern, as they have not compromised their credibility.
Making statements like this shows that he is mentally unbalanced and dangerous to the public. Anyone making these sorts of threats should be taken quite seriously by law enforcement, and he needs to be committed for a mental health evaluation at the very least. He could easily be the next Nikolas Cruz waiting to snap.
Oh BS! Get over it! Did you read the signs and hear some of the chanting and ALL the rhetoric from those marchers? They were saying WAY worse than what Nugent said. The degrading, insulting, over the top c omparisons of ALL firearms owners to murderers like Cruz.
Hell, I've said wore than what Nugent said just yelling at the TV through those ignorant marches. Which is what they were. Ignorant, misinformed, spreading deliberate misinformation, name calling all the stuff Nugent is being called on here only far far WORSE!
Naaa. Nuge was alright . I agree with him. And no, I'm not a violent person at all. I have had to use a firearm in defense of my life against two legged varmints twice in my life and a few times against animal attacks. None of which did I enjoy or revel in regardless o how leftist rabbit people choose to paint such things, that because of blatant ignorance. Sheeesh!
Oh wow, could I go on, but time is short this morning....
I didn't see god's name on the Constitution, and I don't recall anything about firearms in the Ten Commandments or the Beatitudes.
Can you refresh my memory on where the scripture is found to support your claim? Or did god tell you that directly...?
Try seeing that the Founder's wrote this document under our nation, under one God, indivisible (til Obama divided it, ahem) & w/ LIBERTY & JUSTICE FOR ALL. Of course, libs want that removed so maybe Buddha or Allah can be substituted, I guess. C/mon wakeup America & smell the sewer pit rotting outside our front doors.
Who do you think wrote the 1789 Const.? Deists or not they believed in ONE God -- not just anyone proclaiming to be Him. Jefferson, Franklin, Madison, Hamilton, Paine & even Washington fit this category. Educate oneself a bit prior to spouting off stuff. The Right To Bear Arms is Biblical as well as Jesus said, sell thy cloak if need be, to be able to get thy sword. Gospel of Luke, 22:36 at the last Supper.
Obviously for the need to defend vs anti-Christian virtues, no? Or just to plow the fields??
Last edited by movintime; 04-08-2018 at 08:26 AM..
How many times has Ted carried through with any of his threats? Zero?
So his track record is pretty poor.
The other person? What's their track record?
If someone makes regularly outrageous statements of intent but fails to act on any of them, then we know they're most likely empty claims. He's established a pattern of being a blowhard, with no action. Someone making the first such statement deserves far greater concern, as they have not compromised their credibility.
Don't Tread On Me, has no teeth. Unless it can be backed up.
I suggest if you guys want him unarmed, you go take them from him.
How many times has Ted carried through with any of his threats? Zero?
So his track record is pretty poor.
The other person? What's their track record?
If someone makes regularly outrageous statements of intent but fails to act on any of them, then we know they're most likely empty claims. He's established a pattern of being a blowhard, with no action. Someone making the first such statement deserves far greater concern, as they have not compromised their credibility.
So in this twisted perspective - Harris is more dangerous than Nugent. One must certainly have to ignore reality to get to this point.
IF one 'regularly makes threats to shoot up schools but fails to act on any of them' I guess we can just ignore it according to your theory
Yes, it is true that President Trump believes in such. Recall in February when he said, regarding potentially dangerous people, 'Take the gun first, go through due process second'?
Trump is a statist. Of course he believes in violence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
