Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I hope he launches a significant strike that does lasting damage.
Chemical weapons should not exist. The Syrian government lied about it and they should pay a significant price.
We dilly-dallied with Al Queda back in the old days and it cost the lives of some 3,000 civilians in America.
Significant price. That meane many military deaths and/or lasing damage to their war making capability.
Why don't you fly over there and do it yourself, and pay for it out of your own pocket? Does $21 trillion in debt mean nothing to you?
The Syrian government has never declared war on nor has threatened the United States.
Assad is no threat to the United States. He is secular, like Saddam. The people he and Russia are fighting are worse than al Qaeda.
"Syria Attack 'Could Be Very Soon or Not So Soon at All" D. Trump
Does Trump have a clue at all?
First it is "We will make a decision soon"
Then he taunts Russia to "Get ready" for our "nice, smart" missiles.
Then almost every one points out to Trump how he is telegraphing military moves that he explicitly denounced Obama and Clinton for numerous times.
So now he tries to take it back by confusing the issue even more.
This president is so full of crap, he has no clue what he is saying, what he has said or what to do. He just runs off at the mouth based on what sees in the news at any particular moment.
If you are thinking this... then the enemies (or whomever) have no clue what he will do either.
That is a good thing with regards this whole Syria mess.
Maybe there will be no missile strike? The art of the deal? Remember that Trump, unlike Obama, doesn't announce what military action will happen ahead of time.
He got the intel yesterday evening, it was a False Flag by ISIS.
I think Obama made the right decision by not overthrowing Assad. Getting rid of Middle Eastern dictators, as evil as they might be, only leads to other problems. I still think the U.S. should have left Saddam Hussein alone.
I find it interesting, if not ironic, that Leftists, and even some conservatives, blasted the President's choice of John Bolton for NSA, claiming he was a "war monger," and now both Democrats and Republicans are demanding we go to war against Syria!
I believe it would be immoral to do nothing in this case. What we should do is another question.
I dont know anyone suggesting we go to war. I DO hear folks suggesting we punish Syria.
Its the difference between punching someone for a action they did, and killing them.
He got the intel yesterday evening, it was a False Flag by ISIS.
If true wouldnt it have made more sense to say "we are continuing to investigate to make sure that our actions are just and right"?
So nah, not buying it. The guys just unstable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
