More Death-More Relevance? (soldier, Saddam, states, claim)

[TKramar]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Taking NO offensive actions is not only impossible but as 911 showed, not very responsible.

You keep the people OUT of the U.S.

It's like if you can't reach me, it's a little hard for you to punch me.

[TKramar]

Originally Posted by 01Snake

Yes. Let's just sit back and wait for the next blow.

Yes, additionally, you don't waste the money going over THERE to look for them. All you have to do is stay home and kill whoever invades your country.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by TKramar

You keep the people OUT of the U.S.

It's like if you can't reach me, it's a little hard for you to punch me.

How exactly do you propose we do THAT? We cant even keep a Mexican out who simply wants to come here to work, and you think we're going to keep those out who want to kill us?

um.. yeah, that'll happen..

[TKramar]

Originally Posted by pghquest

How exactly do you propose we do THAT? We cant even keep a Mexican out who simply wants to come here to work, and you think we're going to keep those out who want to kill us?

um.. yeah, that'll happen..

Put the army in the RIGHT country?

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by TKramar

Put the army in the RIGHT country?

Per the current president, previous president, and Congress, they argued thats exactly what they did..

[TKramar]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Per the current president, previous president, and Congress, they argued thats exactly what they did..

Let me think, the purpose of the military is national defense.

Wouldn't that mean they're in the WRONG nation, unless they're RIGHT HERE?

[burdell]

Originally Posted by pghquest

So how many casulties would be acceptable to you? We have lost 86,000 citizens due to murders here IN THE USA, in the time we have lost 4,000 in Iraq.. WHATS ACCEPTABLE?

NONE are acceptable to me if they are incurred for the wrong purpose.

WHAT does the number of murders in the US have to do with Iraq?

Will you next say Iraq's casualty numbers are fine because more people die of cancer?

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by TKramar

Let me think, the purpose of the military is national defense.

Wouldn't that mean they're in the WRONG nation, unless they're RIGHT HERE?

So your proposing that instead of having a military, we have 500,000 border patrol agents?

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by burdell

NONE are acceptable to me if they are incurred for the wrong purpose.

WHAT does the number of murders in the US have to do with Iraq?

Will you next say Iraq's casualty numbers are fine because more people die of cancer?

I say we have to many dying yearly due to car wrecks.. Lets get rid of cars.. They are of course dying for the wrong purpose..

Where is the outrage over the murders in the USA? They clearly have died for the wrong reason... (one would assume that at least some of them have)

[burdell]

Originally Posted by pghquest

So your proposing that instead of having a military, we have 500,000 border patrol agents?

I propose we have a military that's NOT used for nation building, as the current POTUS claimed he didn't believe it should be used in his 2000 campaign.