Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But when he's the government there is a way to fire him and way to change the rules under which he operates. You can specify how much money he can take from your wallet.
I don't claim that our system is perfect, nor that any governmental system is, just that they're necessary and ours is a lot less burdensome than most.
On the bold, tell me how I can specify that they take $0 from our wallets and let us choose where our money goes...
I also don't buy that it's necessary, but I don't feel like derailing another thread with that topic.
On the bold, tell me how I can specify that they take $0 from my wallet...
I'd like to know that as well. What's good for the goose (the 47% of 1040 filers paying no federal income tax whatsoever) is good for the gander (me!).
People hate on Mexico and all the ****hole countries that have no safety net, yet they want to enact policies that would have us be the same. Being a first world country has it's costs and bread and circuses are among them.
They are bleephole countries not because they have no safety net.
The so called safety net is nothing but modern slavery.
Many say give yours away
But of course they did not scrimp, save, Sweat and toil for it -
They got all theirs free
But what are they willing to contribute to run the government
?
You may stop laughing anytime
Every socialist country such as USSR, China and NK had or has a safety net. Are they not bleepholes
That's the most blatant (and incorrect) example of 'correlation is not equal to causation' that I've ever seen. Besides which, except for NK which doesn't have a safety net, Russia and China are not bleepholes by any standard. Not my cup o tea perhaps, but they aren't bleepholes.
Every single first world country has a safety net.
But you dodged my question. If that lack of a safety net and their laissez faire capitalism (which I assume you think is ideal) aren't the reason Mexico or all the those other bleepholes are bleepholes, then what is the reason?
That's the most blatant (and incorrect) example of 'correlation is not equal to causation' that I've ever seen. Besides which, except for NK which doesn't have a safety net, Russia and China are not bleepholes by any standard. Not my cup o tea perhaps, but they aren't bleepholes.
Every single first world country has a safety net.
But you dodged my question. If that lack of a safety net and their laissez faire capitalism (which I assume you think is ideal) aren't the reason Mexico or all the those other bleepholes are bleepholes, then what is the reason?
NK has the best safety net in the world. The government looks after everyone from cradle to grave.
Russia and China are not bleepholes now because they adopted capitalism! They were the biggest bleepholes when they were practicing socialism.
The so called safety net is nothing but slavery - the majority forces the minority to work and provide for them.
Last edited by lifeexplorer; 04-27-2018 at 05:29 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
