Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No emails were determined to be classified. Some were purported to be by people who did not have the authority to make them classified.
But go ahead. Come up with an authorized source that made them classified. And cite the authority that let them classify them.
Again I will not hold my breath.
They cannot and won't. They will only spew what the Trump/Hannity propaganda wing puts out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by halfamazing
It's not about wishful thinking, its about justice for all in involved. Whether you are the POS or FBI director, you obstruct, collude, and/or leak classified information, you should be held accountable.
What specific classified information did Comey leak?
They cannot and won't. They will only spew what the Trump/Hannity propaganda wing puts out there.
What specific classified information did Comey leak?
The poster you are quoting first is insisting that he/she knows better than the intelligence agencies who went through Hillary's emails and determined who the information belonged to, then asked those agencies that owned the information, is it was classified.
The intelligence agencies revealed that over 2000 of Hillary emails had classified information in them, 110 of the emails had information in them that was classified at the time they were sent, or recieved.
lvmensch is directly contradicting the intelligence what agencies found in their review of Hillary emails.
You litterly have a poster on here insisting that all the intelligence agencies are wrong, and he/she is correct.
The poster you are quoting first is insisting that he/she knows better than the intelligence agencies who went through Hillary's emails and determined who the information belonged to, then asked those agencies that owned the information, is it was classified.
The intelligence agencies revealed that over 2000 of Hillary emails had classified information in them, 110 of the emails had information in them that was classified at the time they were sent, or recieved.
lvmensch is directly contradicting the intelligence what agencies found in their review of Hillary emails.
You litterly have a poster on here insisting that all the intelligence agencies are wrong, and he/she is correct.
The poster you are quoting first is insisting that he/she knows better than the intelligence agencies who went through Hillary's emails and determined who the information belonged to, then asked those agencies that owned the information, is it was classified.
The intelligence agencies revealed that over 2000 of Hillary emails had classified information in them, 110 of the emails had information in them that was classified at the time they were sent, or recieved.
lvmensch is directly contradicting the intelligence what agencies found in their review of Hillary emails.
You litterly have a poster on here insisting that all the intelligence agencies are wrong, and he/she is correct.
No intelligence agency claims that information from their agency was contained in the State Dept communications. The claim is in fact that the subjects of the emails were classified.
And again Comey made it clear that other agencies were claiming the documents should have been classified.
Basically Comey sabotaged the candidacy of Clinton. He now asserts the October smear was because he did not want to embarrass Clinton after she was elected which he considered a certainty. It would appear clear that a very early act of Clinton would have been to fire Comey. That of course makes it virtually impossible for their to have been an "understanding" between Comey and Clinton.
What should have happened is Obama should have fired Comey in July for malfeasance.
Comey should have never gotten into the "what ifs scenarios" ....... speaks to politics, something he should have stayed out of, he was the FBI Director.
No emails were determined to be classified. Some were purported to be by people who did not have the authority to make them classified.
But go ahead. Come up with an authorized source that made them classified. And cite the authority that let them classify them.
Again I will not hold my breath.
You probably trust PolitiFact and the NYTimes:
"Of the tens of thousands of emails investigators reviewed, 113 contained classified information, and three of those had classification markers. FBI Director James Comey has said Clinton should have known that some of the 113 were classified, but others she might have understandably missed."
"WASHINGTON — A special intelligence review of two emails that Hillary Rodham Clinton received as secretary of state on her personal account — including one about North Korea’s nuclear weapons program — has endorsed a finding by the inspector general for the intelligence agencies that the emails contained highly classified information when Mrs. Clinton received them, senior intelligence officials said."
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
It looks like Comey is now under IG investigation for releasing classified information in his memos.
It's interesting that even Comey himself in his memos says this information is classified, but he releases to the public. It looks like they are trying the Hillary defense, they weren't classified at the time.
This WSJ article is full of spin, but they are reporting this.
WASHINGTON—At least two of the memos that former FBI Director James Comey gave to a friend outside of the government contained information that officials now consider classified, according to people familiar with the matter, prompting a review by the Justice Department’s internal watchdog.
The Justice Department inspector general is now conducting an investigation into classification issues related to the Comey memos, according to a person familiar with the matter.
No, what it looks like from your very own post is the IG is now conducting an investigation into "classification issues" which IS NOT the same thing as putting Comey under investigation.
Do you actually read what you choose to quote?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
