Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2018, 04:11 AM
 
26,463 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14615

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Nope it doesn't seem weird.

What is weird is that an American would think a Russian would tell the truth in such matters. LOL.

Kidding -- but not really.

We don't know if Don Jr. provided all the information they needed....so why would they contact this woman.

Sounds like she wants to be in the news. And sounds like someone is fulfilling her dream.
I never said she necessarily would tell the truth or is.

If the FBI used the barometer of we must be certain that the witness will tell the truth before we interview - then the FBI would never do an interview.

In fact she has been caught lying, about her connections to Fusion GPS, which she is now admitting.

If this meeting truly is such a big deal as many in the media and on this very message board have alleged, then you MUST interview her. You can trip her up with other known facts, you can get a different angle, etc...

Do you think she might have more to spill about her Fusion GPS connections? Mueller doesn't want to go down that road; what would that do to the left's version of events?

If she only cares about being in the news, why not get an interview on TV, she could easily do it.


Russian Lawyer Who Met Don Jr. Submits Senate | The Daily Caller
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2018, 04:22 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,790,245 times
Reputation: 37884
Natalia Veselnitskaya is a Russian attorney linked to the Russian government in a corruption case winding its way through the Swiss courts.

https://investigaterussia.org/media/...ent-swiss-case

This would be the same Russian attorney who has worked tirelessly to get the Magnitsky Act act reversed.

According to some C-D posts, Ms. Veselnitskaya maintains that team Mueller has not asked her whether she is or is not linked to the Russian government.

Now why would team Mueller waste time listening to a Russian attorney lie about who she works for? What would be the point?

What I'm curious about is what's up with those posting support for a Kremlin-backed attorney on C-D.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 04:39 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,456 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10437
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Natalia Veselnitskaya is a Russian attorney linked to the Russian government in a corruption case winding its way through the Swiss courts.

https://investigaterussia.org/media/...ent-swiss-case

This would be the same Russian attorney who has worked tirelessly to get the Magnitsky Act act reversed.

According to some C-D posts, Ms. Veselnitskaya maintains that team Mueller has not asked her whether she is or is not linked to the Russian government.

Now why would team Mueller waste time listening to a Russian attorney lie about who she works for? What would be the point?

What I'm curious about is what's up with those posting support for a Kremlin-backed attorney on C-D.

If you think people are posting support for her then that is on you, no one is. People are simply curious as to why mueller is afraid to interview her.

Ironic that he files indictments on the 13 Russians, knowing he'll never get to interview them. Yet, he's too afraid of the one that is actually willing to be interviewed....he must be afraid she'll bring out information that will sink his masters. Maybe he should go for show like he did with the 13, just file an indictment on her, letting it sit there gathering dust with the others, then leak it like he did the others and call it a day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 09:35 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Natalia Veselnitskaya is upset that Mueller and his team has not yet contacted her so she can tell her side of the story - that she does not and did not represent the Russian government.

If this meeting is such a big deal, it seems like they would have interviewed her to ask her a few questions by now...it is been well over a year since we've known about this meeting.

She also says that parts of the famous dossier are provably nonsense.

She will meet with Mueller or his team in Europe, because she fears for her safety if she travels to the US. Or she will do an interview by phone.

https://apnews.com/b9657a2a41184b72b...-contacted-her

Doesn't it seem weird that there was so much consternation over this meeting in the media and Mueller hasn't even tried to contact her yet?

Why would he? He already knows the FBI & DNC paid her to be here. Pappy is an FBI operative working with her on the sting.
How do you think she was able to get in and roam freely without a Passport or Visa?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 10:02 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,790,245 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
If you think people are posting support for her then that is on you, no one is. People are simply curious as to why mueller is afraid to interview her.

Ironic that he files indictments on the 13 Russians, knowing he'll never get to interview them. Yet, he's too afraid of the one that is actually willing to be interviewed....he must be afraid she'll bring out information that will sink his masters. Maybe he should go for show like he did with the 13, just file an indictment on her, letting it sit there gathering dust with the others, then leak it like he did the others and call it a day.
Where did you come up with this nonsense that Mueller is "afraid" to interview Veselnitskaya?

Where did you come up with that Mueller "leaked" the indictments on the 13 Russians?

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced that Mueller had indicted 13 Russian nationals for U.S. election meddling. I would hardly call that a "leak."

Did you get this from Breitbart, RT, ZeroHedge, ... what?

You need better sources of information. It appears you've been lied to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 10:31 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Where did you come up with this nonsense that Mueller is "afraid" to interview Veselnitskaya?

Where did you come up with that Mueller "leaked" the indictments on the 13 Russians?

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced that Mueller had indicted 13 Russian nationals for U.S. election meddling. I would hardly call that a "leak."

Did you get this from Breitbart, RT, ZeroHedge, ... what?

You need better sources of information. It appears you've been lied to.


13 Russians, trolling social media, with fake accounts. OK, that is ground breaking.
When will they be arraigned?
They had nothing to do with Putin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 11:00 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,456 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10437
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Where did you come up with this nonsense that Mueller is "afraid" to interview Veselnitskaya?

Where did you come up with that Mueller "leaked" the indictments on the 13 Russians?

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced that Mueller had indicted 13 Russian nationals for U.S. election meddling. I would hardly call that a "leak."

Did you get this from Breitbart, RT, ZeroHedge, ... what?

You need better sources of information. It appears you've been lied to.
You're trying to say that Trump Jr's meeting with her is not and never was a part of this investigation? If that meeting was a part of the investigation then interviewing her would also be a part of it, since she had a major part in that meeting.
It's obvious that he's afraid to speak with her, he's afraid that she will give him dirt about obama and the clintons instead of Trump Jr. He doesn't want that as part of the official records.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
13 Russians, trolling social media, with fake accounts. OK, that is ground breaking.
When will they be arraigned?
They had nothing to do with Putin.
^^This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,363,905 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Natalia Veselnitskaya is a Russian attorney linked to the Russian government in a corruption case winding its way through the Swiss courts.

https://investigaterussia.org/media/...ent-swiss-case

This would be the same Russian attorney who has worked tirelessly to get the Magnitsky Act act reversed.

According to some C-D posts, Ms. Veselnitskaya maintains that team Mueller has not asked her whether she is or is not linked to the Russian government.

Now why would team Mueller waste time listening to a Russian attorney lie about who she works for? What would be the point?

What I'm curious about is what's up with those posting support for a Kremlin-backed attorney on C-D.


That's easy!

The reason why Mueller would question her is because we would like to know who else she works for, i.e., the Obama DOJ via Fusion GPS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 11:56 AM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,744,768 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
She lies better than Trump does
Do you really think an agent of the Russian government is going to tell the truth about anything Putin doesn't want her to?
I imagine the FBI likely had her under surveillance and didn't Trump say they tapped Trump Tower
Maybe they caught Trump on that phone line that was reported open for someone to listen in to the meeting
If she's an agent of the Russian Govt as you claim, then why was Fusion GPS working with her & taking money from her? Better yet, why did Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS founder/CEO meet with her twice the day of the Trump Tower meeting, both before & after it? Sounds like the Russians and Fusion GPS were colluding to frame our president. We already knew Fusion GPS was paying Russian intelligence agents & high ranking Kremlin officials to create dirt on Trump, to undermine our president. Kind of sounds like we're investigating the wrong people doesn't it? Worse yet, it sounds like they launched an investigation that many people like you are hoping leads to impeachment of the POTUS based on Russian propaganda & the suckers on the left bought it hook, line and sinke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
6,830 posts, read 3,217,168 times
Reputation: 11576
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Some of us can understand the concept. Others can't get past the rudimentary notions.

How many more millions would a lawyer make if the was the one to take down a president ?
His salary I'm guessing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top