Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2018, 09:27 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
So why did Hillary leave the Watergate committee? She was a pure, Democrat political operative that got caught. You can quote Snopes all you want. The reality is, her own party thought she was more of a risk than what she was worth. She was never a successful lawyer by any stretch.

The premise of this post is correct. Hillary is a hypocritical, ultra radical feminist, caught in her own prejudices. Maybe get back on topic?
She was a newbie law school graduate when she worked in Washington DC. Not some pure, Democratic political operative. The reality is, her boss wasn't satisfied with her job performance. That's the reality. And she was a successful lawyer, for years, in Little Rock.

The premise of your post is incorrect. Hillary is not an ultra radical feminist. She is simply a strong and very intelligent woman working in a world dominated by men.

And if you want to get back on topic, acknowledge that the topic is a LIE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2018, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Disagreeing with what you say, and pointing out your bald lies are two different things.

Hillary hasn't been a Democratic operative her entire life.

She began life as a Republican. She and Bill Clinton began dating before her stint in DC. She moved to Arkansas to be with the man she loved. She wasn't a politician when she moved, and neither was Bill. She married him before he began his political career. She was a successful attorney, and her income supported the family because his salary as Attorney General, nor as Governor, were adequate.
They are "lies" because you disagree with the facts. Hillary got married to Bill in October, 1975. When did the Watergate hearings take place in which she was a political Democrat operative? May, 1973, to July, 1974, well before her marriage. Any legal career she had was in the capacity of a Democrat operative disguised as employed by a law firm the same as most other political hacks.

So Hillary was a political operative well before she married Bill, or can't you read a calendar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 09:34 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
They are "lies" because you disagree with the facts. Hillary got married to Bill in October, 1975. When did the Watergate hearings take place in which she was a political Democrat operative? May, 1973, to July, 1974, well before her marriage. Any legal career she had was in the capacity of a Democrat operative disguised as employed by a law firm the same as most other political hacks.

So Hillary was a political operative well before she married Bill, or can't you read a calendar?
Your lies are lies because they aren't based on facts.

She was a newbie in DC when she worked on Watergate, and her job wasn't as a party operative. She moved from DC to Arkansas to be with the man she loved. Her legal career was not in the capacity of a Democratic operative. Her legal career was as a top lawyer at a well-respected law firm.

Once again, why don't you get back on topic, and concede that this entire thread is based on a LIE?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Your lies are lies because they aren't based on facts.

She was a newbie in DC when she worked on Watergate, and her job wasn't as a party operative. She moved from DC to Arkansas to be with the man she loved. Her legal career was not in the capacity of a Democratic operative. Her legal career was as a top lawyer at a well-respected law firm.

Once again, why don't you get back on topic, and concede that this entire thread is based on a LIE?
Again, please look at the timeline for Hillary's involvement with the Watergate hearings, and her marriage to Bill. Was she not a political operative during Watergate, well before her marriage?

The premise of this thread is true. Hillary's marriage is one of political convenience, and political opportunity, and yes a sham by most measurements of a true marriage. She is a radical feminist, and maybe more than that which is inconsistent with most heterosexual marriages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:30 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Again, please look at the timeline for Hillary's involvement with the Watergate hearings, and her marriage to Bill. Was she not a political operative during Watergate, well before her marriage?

The premise of this thread is true. Hillary's marriage is one of political convenience, and political opportunity, and yes a sham by most measurements of a true marriage. She is a radical feminist, and maybe more than that which is inconsistent with most heterosexual marriages.
No, she was not a political operative during Watergate. She was a recent law school graduate, studying to take the bar, who got a job in DC. That didn't work out. Her boss at her job wasn't satisfied with her. She failed to pass the DC bar exam. She decided to join the man she loved in Arkansas, where she did pass the bar and began a law career. He was teaching at the university. They decided to get married. Neither she nor Bill were politicians when they got married. It was not one of political convenience. She had no way of knowing what Bill's political future would be. She had no way of knowing what her political future would be. It was ARKANSAS. Bill's political fortunes were not helped by marrying Hillary. Neither had money or families with political connections. She's hardly radical. As for your veiled comment about heterosexual marriages, shame on you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,202 posts, read 19,210,098 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Again, please look at the timeline for Hillary's involvement with the Watergate hearings, and her marriage to Bill. Was she not a political operative during Watergate, well before her marriage?

The premise of this thread is true. Hillary's marriage is one of political convenience, and political opportunity, and yes a sham by most measurements of a true marriage. She is a radical feminist, and maybe more than that which is inconsistent with most heterosexual marriages.
You obviously do not have any idea what a "political operative" is. Presumably you are equally unaware of what most of the other words you've used mean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:55 AM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,579,752 times
Reputation: 14393
I'm just surprised people think Snopes is unbiased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:58 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,962,522 times
Reputation: 33185
More nothingburger from Pull. Zzzzzz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 10:59 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,729,135 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
bluntforcetruth is fake news. Truly fake news.

Just go to twitter and check Hillary's status.

As for your other garbage, the Clintons married for love. They loved one another.
Baloney. Bill was sleeping with other women before and after they got married. Hillary had her own girlfriends on the side. Bill said in an interview that "Hillary had eaten more **** than him.".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 11:04 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Baloney. Bill was sleeping with other women before and after they got married. Hillary had her own girlfriends on the side. Bill said in an interview that "Hillary had eaten more **** than him.".
Bill definitely was an adulterer. That does not mean he didn't love Hillary, just that he has difficulty being faithful. As for your claim regarding Bill saying that, that's a LIE. That's completely and utterly untrue. Shame on you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top