Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,580 posts, read 10,306,098 times
Reputation: 19358

Advertisements

Man is thrown out of bar for wearing maga hat. Man sues and loses in court.

A Manhattan judge ruled Wednesday that there’s nothing “outrageous” about throwing the president’s supporters out of bars — because the law doesn’t protect against political discrimination.

"anyone who supports Trump — or believes in what you believe — is not welcome here! And you need to leave right now because we won’t serve you!” Piatek claims the staff of The Happiest Hour on West 10th Street told him after he and his pals complained about the rude service they were getting from a bartender.


"...that plaintiff was not served and eventually escorted out of the bar because of his perceived support for President Trump is not outrageous conduct,” the judge ruled.

I find this very unfair. a baker is sued, loses, and fined thousands for not baking a wedding cake because homosexual marriage is against his personal religious beliefs, but it is perfectly legal for a bar patron to be denied service and thrown out of a bar for his maga hat.

I think both businesses should be able to decide who they serve.

https://nypost.com/2018/04/25/judge-...mp-supporters/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:35 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,093,176 times
Reputation: 13660
Both the bakery and this bar should be allowed to operate like morons if they're so compelled to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:39 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,111,759 times
Reputation: 8224
It's an interesting situation. Sexual preference constitutes a protected class. Political affiliation doesn't.

It's also kind of interesting because Manhattan is very Democrat. Therefore we can guess that the guy was wearing the hat with the intention of causing a ruckus of some sort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:41 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,225 posts, read 80,405,058 times
Reputation: 57118
Regardless of what anyone thinks should be allowed or is fair, the judge has to follow the law. Trump supporters are not a protected class under the law. Likewise, the owner could legally throw someone out for being ugly, having red hair, or wearing a clown suit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:42 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,553,017 times
Reputation: 4852
Lobby to make political affiliation a protected class if you don’t like it. This case never stood a chance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,580 posts, read 10,306,098 times
Reputation: 19358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
It's an interesting situation. Sexual preference constitutes a protected class. Political affiliation doesn't.

It's also kind of interesting because Manhattan is very Democrat. Therefore we can guess that the guy was wearing the hat with the intention of causing a ruckus of some sort.
the man said he wore the hat to the 9/11 memorial. a hat doesn't "cause a ruckus".

I assume you will be happy to leave if you are wearing a hope and change tee shirt and are asked to leave a restaurant because the staff won't serve democrats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:42 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,093,176 times
Reputation: 13660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
It's an interesting situation. Sexual preference constitutes a protected class. Political affiliation doesn't.

It's also kind of interesting because Manhattan is very Democrat. Therefore we can guess that the guy was wearing the hat with the intention of causing a ruckus of some sort.
Wearing a hat with a dissenting political view is "causing a ruckus?" Censorship much?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:45 PM
 
5,913 posts, read 3,166,795 times
Reputation: 4397
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
Man is thrown out of bar for wearing maga hat. Man sues and loses in court.

A Manhattan judge ruled Wednesday that there’s nothing “outrageous” about throwing the president’s supporters out of bars — because the law doesn’t protect against political discrimination.

"anyone who supports Trump — or believes in what you believe — is not welcome here! And you need to leave right now because we won’t serve you!” Piatek claims the staff of The Happiest Hour on West 10th Street told him after he and his pals complained about the rude service they were getting from a bartender.


"...that plaintiff was not served and eventually escorted out of the bar because of his perceived support for President Trump is not outrageous conduct,” the judge ruled.

I find this very unfair. a baker is sued, loses, and fined thousands for not baking a wedding cake because homosexual marriage is against his personal religious beliefs, but it is perfectly legal for a bar patron to be denied service and thrown out of a bar for his maga hat.

I think both businesses should be able to decide who they serve.

https://nypost.com/2018/04/25/judge-...mp-supporters/
Dude, you even copied and pasted from the article and you still have to ask about a baker that broke a law. I remember when conservatives were law and order. Not any longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:47 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,553,017 times
Reputation: 4852
“I hate activist judges except when they don’t literally invent laws that result in the outcome I personally desire!”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2018, 07:47 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,930 posts, read 48,931,083 times
Reputation: 54917
I would have taken my hat off. Ordered a picture of beer.

Then "accidentally" dropped my picture of beer in the middle of the entry as I was leaving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top