Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course not. Those aren’t Americans, and since the news barely makes an effort to remind us we even still have troops overseas, much less show us the body count, most people don’t give it a thought. Since Trump is in office, I would have thought it would change, but the media is too busy with porn stars and Russian collusion to concentrate on wars.
Because the media LOVES war. It's a ratings bonanza for them.
Airing on regular TV in New Mexico. Apparently, candidate ads cannot be censored.
of course the PROGRESSIVEs(fascism/socialism/communism) wants to get rid of the NRA and guns....first step in a dictatorship is taking the guns away from the people
They run their platform on illegal aliens, higher taxes and killing the 2nd amendment.
So do Republicans.
They run their platform on smaller government, lower taxes, and less spending. But we still end up with bigger government, higher taxes, and more spending.
Because the media LOVES war. It's a ratings bonanza for them.
I think the opposite. Reporting on war seems to be a ratings loser compared to the sex life of Donald Trump. Otherwise they’d be reporting more about it. And it would probably be a more effective tool to get people to start disliking Trump. The Stormy Daniels story doesn’t seem to be doing the job.
I see the hyperbole has begun. I'm sure it feels good, but:Ask yourself why someone, anyone would think this is a winning strategy. Someone has decided flipping the bird at the NRA has benefits. That's new.
The NRA just put a traitorous criminal - yes, Oliver North - in a position of power and recognition. It's considered emblematic of the organization. You thought you'd be able to sell the "only trying to protect the Constitution" after that little maneuver?
I think the opposite. Reporting on war seems to be a ratings loser compared to the sex life of Donald Trump. Otherwise they’d be reporting more about it. And it would probably be a more effective tool to get people to start disliking Trump. The Stormy Daniels story doesn’t seem to be doing the job.
Whenever there is an overseas bombing campaign or another act of U.S. aggression, the media collectively soils itself. Remember how they were practically giddy when Trump ordered the Syria bombings last month?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
