Trump plan could strip Title X funds from abortion providers (drug, suspected)

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by natalie469

Janelle, do you really want us to go to back alley abortions. We have evolved and now you want us to go backwards

Killing babies is what is backwards.

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

Um...haven't we been told time after time, year after year by the left that PP does not use taxpayer funds for abortions? Guess they shouldn't be impacted then.

You hit the nail on the head. This program shouldn't not impact them at all. Don't know why they are protesting it.

[Seacove]

Originally Posted by janelle144

Killing babies is what is backwards.

Forcing the birth of 300,000 babies a year into poverty is definitely backwards. Abortion is legal.

Originally Posted by janelle144

You hit the nail on the head. This program shouldn't not impact them at all. Don't know why they are protesting it.

Make it by state and let Planned Parenthood operate in blue states. Let red states force their poor to have the babies and let red states pay the price for that.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by janelle144

Killing babies is what is backwards.

Do you follow pregnant women around to monitor their prenatal care? Do you report them to child protective services when it is not up to your standards?

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by Bobdreamz

really now?

I find American wars barbaric yet my tax dollars fund the lunacy of such fiascos.

Once again Planned Parenthood provides essential healthcare for women and tax payer monies are not used to provide abortions.

No matter how much you try to "spin" that lie.

Then they should not mind separating----one that does abortion from one that does the health tests.

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

Do you follow pregnant women around to monitor their prenatal care? Do you report them to child protective services when it is not up to your standards?

You are comparing apples and oranges.

[natalie469]

Originally Posted by janelle144

Killing babies is what is backwards.

So you are saying you want to go back to back alley abortions?

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by Seacove

Forcing the birth of 300,000 babies a year into poverty is definitely backwards. Abortion is legal.



Make it by state and let Planned Parenthood operate in blue states. Let red states force their poor to have the babies and let red states pay the price for that.

This plan does not stop abortions. Read it again. It separates the facilities.

[Seacove]

Originally Posted by janelle144

This plan does not stop abortions. Read it again. It separates the facilities.

Thus doubling the costs. In other words trying to end any resources for the poor so the poor are forced to have babies born into poverty.

Make no mistake, those that can afford it, will still get abortions. The poorest will be the ones Republicans force to be born.

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by natalie469

So you are saying you want to go back to back alley abortions?

I'd rather have no abortions but if we must then separate the facilities like this plan does.