Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-26-2018, 05:57 PM
 
Location: AZ
3,321 posts, read 1,100,375 times
Reputation: 1608

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
UE has been low for a long time. Food stamp usage is still 50% higher than 2007 but the population has grown only 8%. The progressives are still in power and America is still losing.
The GOP holds all the cards at the moment, so do tell, how are “the progressives still in power”?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2018, 06:11 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555 View Post
The GOP holds all the cards at the moment, so do tell, how are “the progressives still in power”?
Its a attempt to deny reality. The best they got is "it takes 60 vote in the Senate". Reality is-thats a senate rule, not a law, and anytime they want they can change it with a majority vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 06:13 PM
 
4,336 posts, read 1,554,632 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Nah. They'll be living out of cardboard boxes beneath bridges, foraging for their dinner in dumpsters, and will still be worshiping their God Emperor. That's how cultists think.
You realize your language patterns and usage parallel the brown shirts, i.e. SA if you know who they were (well probably don't, but that is what you are patterning yourself after). Filthy Brown Shirts.

Last edited by Open-D; 06-26-2018 at 06:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,369 posts, read 19,156,062 times
Reputation: 26255
Quote:
Originally Posted by case44 View Post
Poor people are actually going back to work. They're not going to need food stamps.
A Democrat couldn't hear worse news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 08:05 PM
 
3,357 posts, read 1,233,658 times
Reputation: 2302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
You can keep your food stamps, I'll take a good paying job with benefits, insurance and a pension.
99% of SNAP recipients as well as the rest of us feel the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
There is huge fraud in the welfare programs. I listen to a Conservative talk show out of Boston and the host is always highlighting the fraud such as when a drug dealer is arrested and the cops find multiple EBT cards on him or worse when an illegal alien is picked up and they find multiple cards with different names on them.
For years the responsible have wanted to require a photo on the recipients card to stop the fraud but the dominant Left in my state has always shot that idea down.
Welfare should be there for the people that need it but there are many that are scamming the system and that is costing us all.
If the GOP wants to clean up welfare fraud then I am all for it.
The reason they don't require a photo on an EBT card is because elderly and disabled recipients frequently have someone shop for them and it's not always the same person. If grandma had her two daughters shop for her, and they went and got card with their photo on it, then what would happen if they weren't available and she had to ask a neighbor to do her shopping?

When EBT cards are found in someone's possession, the local social service agency can give the address and phone number of the person named on the card and they can be contacted to see if they are a victim of theft.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
UE has been low for a long time. Food stamp usage is still 50% higher than 2007 but the population has grown only 8%. The progressives are still in power and America is still losing.
I didn't know Trump was a progressive, that's very interesting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 05:22 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
Who is your source?
Roper Center, Cornell University. It's the last time they made the distinction between "some high school" and "high school graduate" because the results were so embarrassing for the Dems.

https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/poll...ps-voted-2012/

It's also true that the low-income overwhelmingly vote Dem, and that Dem voters are at least 2/3, if not more, of those enrolled in public assistance programs.

Last edited by InformedConsent; 06-27-2018 at 05:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 05:26 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamatomic View Post
... and you are misinterpreting the data.
No, I am not. The data is quite clear, and is also supported by the following additional source. There's actual research on that:

Are Welfare Recipients Mostly Republican or Democrat? - Tino Sanandaji, PhD

Chart, Democrats:

https://tino.us/wp-content/uploads/2...-1-695x632.png

Author's credentials:
PhD in Public Policy from the University of Chicago
MA in Economics from the University of Chicago
MSc from Stockholm School of Economics

Other info from the link:

Share of Recipients of each program that identified as supporters of Republican party:

Gov. Subsidized Housing 12%
Medicaid: 16%
Food Stamps: 20%
Unemployment Compensation: 21%
Welfare or public assistance: 22%
Disability benefits from government 25%

Data source:
https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/programs/Merged_Data_Set

It's in the Dems' best interest to keep a certain percentage of the population poor and on public assistance to maintain their voter base. They wouldn't be able to win elections without them.
And even worse, it's minorities (Blacks, and to a lesser degree, Hispanics) who are very disproportionately kept poor.

Now that Dem voters understand that you're supporting the maintenance and growth of a perpetually poor and welfare-programs dependent underclass that MUST be kept poor in order to keep most of them voting Dem, will you all still go along with that?

Get a clue... Why do you think liberals are SO on board with "open borders" that keep low-end wages depressed?..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 05:29 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,102 posts, read 9,015,533 times
Reputation: 18759
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, I am not. The data is quite clear, and is also supported by the following additional source. There's actual research on that:

Are Welfare Recipients Mostly Republican or Democrat? - Tino Sanandaji, PhD

Chart, Democrats:

https://tino.us/wp-content/uploads/2...-1-695x632.png

Author's credentials:
PhD in Public Policy from the University of Chicago
MA in Economics from the University of Chicago
MSc from Stockholm School of Economics

Other info from the link:

Share of Recipients of each program that identified as supporters of Republican party:

Gov. Subsidized Housing 12%
Medicaid: 16%
Food Stamps: 20%
Unemployment Compensation: 21%
Welfare or public assistance: 22%
Disability benefits from government 25%

Data source:
https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/programs/Merged_Data_Set

It's in the Dems' best interest to keep a certain percentage of the population poor and on public assistance to maintain their voter base. They wouldn't be able to win elections without them.
And even worse, it's minorities (Blacks, and to a lesser degree, Hispanics) who are very disproportionately kept poor.

Now that Dem voters understand that you're supporting the maintenance and growth of a perpetually poor and welfare-programs dependent underclass that MUST be kept poor in order to keep most of them voting Dem, will you all still go along with that?

Get a clue... Why do you think liberals are SO on board with "open borders" that keep low-end wages depressed?..
keeping blacks poor and disenfranchised has been the Democrats goal since LBJ was President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top