Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2018, 10:10 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,573 posts, read 17,286,360 times
Reputation: 37320

Advertisements

Here's a question for those more informed than I:
Would an EMP, in fact, disable cars and trucks? Would it destroy the electronics that make them run? The military has me believing that it would because of the way the military designs such things.


If the answer to that question is "Yes", then why doesn't a near miss lightening strike have the same effect? Aren't EMP strikes and a lightening strikes sort of first cousins?


FWIW: If you are an educated engineer and need to use technical terms, go ahead. I was a navy electronic technician and can mostly keep up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2018, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,350,196 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Here's a question for those more informed than I:
Would an EMP, in fact, disable cars and trucks? Would it destroy the electronics that make them run? The military has me believing that it would because of the way the military designs such things.


If the answer to that question is "Yes", then why doesn't a near miss lightening strike have the same effect? Aren't EMP strikes and a lightening strikes sort of first cousins?


FWIW: If you are an educated engineer and need to use technical terms, go ahead. I was a navy electronic technician and can mostly keep up.
There is a difference between EMP and Carrington. EMP involves high energy particles which can damage junctions. If they are energetic enough they would blast most unprotected electronic device. The protection is generally a metal shield. I suppose if energetic enough it gets to everything. But if it is energetic enough it likely kills all the people as well.

Carrington is close to a very big lightning strike. It did things like setting fire to fence posts on long wire fences. Doubtful it does much damage to electronics. Stuff plug in the wall may get whacked but it the input to the power supply is well done that will not happen. In general this stuff is dealt with to one degree or another in the design of electronic devices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top