Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Public Harassment Solutions
Escort them away from the person being harassed. 20 18.35%
They are within their rights. Leave them alone. 35 32.11%
Arrest them for public nuisance and trespassing 51 46.79%
Give them a free meal. 3 2.75%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:34 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,400,201 times
Reputation: 9438

Advertisements

I don't think there is anything new in this. Politicians are routinely asked or questioned by their constituents in public. The difference here is that Trumpers believe that they are above the peasant voters.

I think it goes to the heart of Trumpian philosophy: The Art of the Whine. Whereas, most politicians live with the occasional irate constituent, the Trumpist politician like his mentor, will whine and cry about the unfairness of it all if confronted.

As Harry Truman said if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.

My advice to Trumpists is grow a pair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:39 AM
 
13,961 posts, read 5,625,642 times
Reputation: 8616
Rephrase the question and ask it again -
  • What should happen when trans/homosexuals are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when black people are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when women are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when physically/mentally challenged are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when celebrities are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when doctors are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when lawyers are harassed in public places or at their home.
Whatever you answer for any of the above should apply to public officials as well, considering they are individual Americans just like anyone in any of the above groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:41 AM
 
25,847 posts, read 16,528,639 times
Reputation: 16025
I’m worried that this group will start making the jump from amusing clowns to something worse when they really start to realize how profoundly impactful Trumps Presidency is. Like him or not he is probably choosing a total of 4 SCOTUS judges and an unbelievable number of lower federal judges. Selling out to Hillary may be the biggest mistake in Democrat history outside of siding against Abe Lincoln when he wanted to abolish slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,102,752 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegabern View Post
Harassing is never okay.

Stating your concerns in a civilized manor is not harassing.

These are public officials. Do they think the public doesn't have a right to speak to them? No one was harassing Pruitt. The woman was simply trying to express her frustrations. She was respectful the entire time.
She interrupted his meal? How is that respectful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,102,752 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I’m worried that this group will start making the jump from amusing clowns to something worse when they really start to realize how profoundly impactful Trumps Presidency is. Like him or not he is probably choosing a total of 4 SCOTUS judges and an unbelievable number of lower federal judges. Selling out to Hillary may be the biggest mistake in Democrat history outside of siding against Abe Lincoln when he wanted to abolish slavery.
Insightful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,102,752 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Rephrase the question and ask it again -
  • What should happen when trans/homosexuals are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when black people are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when women are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when physically/mentally challenged are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when celebrities are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when doctors are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when lawyers are harassed in public places or at their home.
Whatever you answer for any of the above should apply to public officials as well, considering they are individual Americans just like anyone in any of the above groups.
Do your own thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:48 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,178 posts, read 13,461,836 times
Reputation: 19477
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
What should happen when public officials are harassed in public places or at their home.
I would have thought that high profile members of the Presidential Administration would have protection officers.

Whilst doesn't Congress have lots of restaurants, and I am sure the GOP have private members clubs.

Capitol Hill Club: Welcome

Do the high profile members of the Trump Adminstration have to even eat in places where they could be harrassed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:50 AM
 
16,591 posts, read 8,610,160 times
Reputation: 19414
I don't get some of you people.
Why should a public official not be allowed to enjoy being in public just because some kooks think harassing them is their right.
I see no problem with people expressing their view at public gatherings, but to essentially stalk people just because they work for the government is ridicules.

I suspect much of this is ideological driven, as the left has always been more inclined to engage in protests, harassment, rioting, etc.
Therefore many on the left who approve of this new phenomenon, are doing so because it is against their ideological foe.
If it were being done to people in the Obama administration, then would be having a different gut reaction to it.


`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,507,044 times
Reputation: 13259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Rephrase the question and ask it again -
  • What should happen when trans/homosexuals are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when black people are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when women are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when physically/mentally challenged are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when celebrities are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when doctors are harassed in public places or at their home.
  • What should happen when lawyers are harassed in public places or at their home.
Whatever you answer for any of the above should apply to public officials as well, considering they are individual Americans just like anyone in any of the above groups.
/end thread. Any argument to this will be silly and futile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2018, 07:53 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,383 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 60996
Quote:
Originally Posted by dothetwist View Post
In public places, the public has a right to confront them in a non-physical, non-threatening manner.
Have it happen to you and let's see how much of a "right" it is. And the answer to be expected from you. Use of "confront" is illuminating as to what's in your head.


I've had a couple restauranteurs here ask me why we (Mrs. NBP and I) rarely go out to eat.

One answer is that with 4 kids we rarely went out to anything but McDonald's for years and haven't changed our not going out habits now that they're grown.

The more nuanced answer is that, as a local elected official, I got tired of having to interrupt our rare meal out answering the questions of constituents who had "heard" something about one thing or another, mostly being incorrect in what the real information was.

It never rose to the level of harassment you're seeing now but it was tiresome to end up eating cold steak/crab cakes/rock fish/Alfredo/etc. every time we tried to have a decent meal somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top