Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is no law that says the public cannot investigate it too.
Where did I say anything different? But some of these folks are just trying to cause trouble for the political enemies and using the death of a young man to achieve that goal. It's less investigation and more smearing. They should be ashamed.
No, it hasn’t. It is a lie. That speed is easily attainable over the internet, it’s not 1990.
Its certainly no lie.
1990 non-University Internet was mostly dialup(SLIP/PPP) and Ethernet was 10Mbit. The speed in that hack is attainable in todays internal networks, not necessarily over the Internet.
We didnt even get FastEthernet 100mbit 802.3 til 1998 or so.
Ive been doing the IT thing since the 8bit era, my Commodore 64 army still works.
Maybe the Nation should have done the technical patdown prior to publication. “Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the [Russian] FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that,” wrote Brian Feldman in a debunking in New York Magazine.
And google fiber for example is certainly more then capable of it. Other providers also can provide that transfer rate to commercial clients. And someone like the DNC would need that speed. So its just idiocy.
1990 non-University Internet was mostly dialup(SLIP/PPP) and Ethernet was 10Mbit. The speed in that hack is attainable in todays internal networks, not necessarily over the Internet.
We didnt even get FastEthernet 100mbit 802.3 til 1998 or so.
Ive been doing the IT thing since the 8bit era, my Commodore 64 army still works.
I've had gigabit networks in my home for over half a decade, and by using pair bonded networking I have been able to far exceed this speed inside my network. Ive been able to hit the speeds externally in this article if I was willing to spend more on my home internet. The DNC servers are not like most household networking services. Im sure they vastly exceeded mine-which are in the top .1% of home networking configurations I imagine.
Sadly my commodore 64 has passed away, but my commodore 128 is still functioning.
I've had gigabit networks in my home for over half a decade, and by using pair bonded networking I have been able to far exceed this speed inside my network. Ive been able to hit the speeds externally in this article if I was willing to spend more on my home internet. The DNC servers are not like most household networking services. Im sure they vastly exceeded mine-which are in the top .1% of home networking configurations I imagine.
Ive had gigabit in my home for years as well, cheers to us both..they doesn't address the topic at hand. Also have gigabit Cable Internet, you may have it as well, again cheers to us both. I easily achieve those speeds while torrenting.
Yes I bet they arent like most as they were hackable, Ill bet they were as stupidly setup as the Hilary email server as Mr Pagliano described as an "out of the box" solution, no wonder he went to redditt for help LOL.
If you can hack anything ive configured properly Id be impressed.. your out of the box toolkit using Kali/nmap isnt going to help you though.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
