Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you are referring to voting machines. They do not have to be online all the time to be hacked, and voting machines at one time or another are plugged into a network.
Nothing these nuts are saying is making any sense. They never do, they are too busy running after a shiny object like a dumb dog chasing a bumper. It's mind numbingly embarrassing
Talk about a failure....He didn't ask them to hack anything, let alone the ELECTION. He was referring to them already having them either through WikiLeaks or the DNC server. GIANT FAIL! Like I said....Dunderheads
I disproved it by quoting Drumph
You replied with some nonsense about something or other. I then asked where you think the hacked emails came from if not the Russians. You then replied:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones
I don't know, but it had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ELECTION which this thread is about. Failure in the education system is a real problem and you're proving it.
Because ALL CAPS WORKS SO WELL :P
I disproved your all caps statement. And now you're saying I'm full of myself.
Another lie from the NYT. Actually, not from the NYT. The "mistake" is yours. The quoted judge did not preside over "the" trial. He presided over a later trial. And his statement has no relevance to the claim that Mueller let them rot in prison when he could have freed them since that wasn't at issue in the trial before the judge the NYT quoted.
It wasn't written by the NY Times. It was written by the Judge herself.
EDIT: I see you subsequently edited your post to say this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9
Actually, not from the NYT. The "mistake" is yours. The quoted judge did not preside over "the" trial. He presided over a later trial. And his statement has no relevance to the claim that Mueller let them rot in prison when he could have freed them.
Given that the Judge that wrote the article is not a "HE" but a "SHE", its obvious that you didn't even know which Judge wrote the article when you claimed the trial was performed by a different Judge. But given that you did not know which Judge wrote it, you cannot credibly claim that it was the wrong one. Your pathetic fraud is exposed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Like I said....Dunderheads
