Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are ignoring the fact that they were signed by 4 different judges, as if it would matter to you if anyone other than Comey and Rosenstein would sign off. Besides, the FBI director is a required signature who would you have sign off, Nunes.
"You are ignoring the fact that they were signed by 4 different judges"
YOU are IGNORING the fact that judges ONLY ACT ON THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO THEM BY THE FBI.
If that info is WRONG, the judges do NOT know it.
I provided you the text from page 16 in the first warrant that the judge was informed that this could be a political hit piece, make your case that the judge wasn't aware.
Where is Candidate #2, had paid for and supplied the dossier?
It does not show up until the 3rd renewal after the dossier was leaked to the public, and only in a footnote.
"McCabe was asked to point to anything in the dossier that he knew to be true. McCabe noted that the dossier said, accurately, that the unpaid, low-level Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page visited Moscow in July 2016.
McCabe's questioners were not impressed. Page's Moscow trip was reported in the press at the time it happened; the simple fact that he was in Russia was not a revelation. Lawmakers reminded McCabe that Page's presence in Moscow was long established and then asked again: Was there anything more in the dossier that McCabe now knows to be true? McCabe, according to sources, said he did not know how to answer the question."
According to the FBI, there doesn't have to be a crime to violate a persons 4th Amendment. Just suspicion and curiosity, is all it takes to violate the Constitution.
The judges ruled on what was presented to them by the FBI as "verified accurate". Their job is not to verify the information in the application. That's the point.
You're searching under every rock looking for ways to justify what happened because you don't want it to be true.
It's as simple as this: Everything that is listed as "Source #1" in the application, everything regarding media leaks, everything regarding Yahoo News or other MSM articles supporting the FBI claims & every claim regarding Carter Page from the time of the election onward, are all based on the Russian 'dossier'. All of them.
In the application the FBI "certified" that everything in the application was "verified as accurate". We know factually that's not true because the FBI & the author of the Russian 'dossier' have told us point blank that it was not verified at the time of the application.
All your talk of 4 Judges, Hillary & Obama not liking each other, Jeb Bush, etc. are all just sideshows. The information in the application must be verified and accurate before submission and they were not. No one is debating this fact. What they're doing, is what you're doing, trying desperately to distract from this basic fact because it destroys the Russian collusion narrative against Trump.
They used the media articles they leaked, as verification it actually happened. To back up the requests.
"You are ignoring the fact that they were signed by 4 different judges"
YOU are IGNORING the fact that judges ONLY ACT ON THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO THEM BY THE FBI.
If that info is WRONG, the judges do NOT know it.
So when they reapplied for the 2, 3 and 4th warrants the judge just rubber stamped it even though they found nothing, common sense should tell us that they found information.
Last edited by Goodnight; 07-24-2018 at 06:58 AM..
So when they reapplied for the 2, 3 and warrant the judge just rubber stamped it even though they found nothing, common sense should tell us that they found information.
But you forget that common sense doesn’t come in to play when addled minds promote nonsensical conspiracy theories.
So when they reapplied for the 2, 3 and 4th warrants the judge just rubber stamped it even though they found nothing, common sense should tell us that they found information.
Yes or no question:
Was the Russian 'dossier' "verified as accurate" at the time the FBI used it in the 1st FISA application against Page?
The U.S. Department of Justice and FBI have released the 412 page FISA application used to gain a Title I surveillance warrant against U.S. Person Carter Page in 2016 while he was working as a low-level unpaid adviser for the campaign of Donald Trump.
When is Adam "piece of" Shiff going to apologize to Nunes?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
