Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2018, 08:39 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,768 times
Reputation: 4852

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
So, lets say you are right...he gets more respect form who?

Are you saying that because trump gave kim this photo op, china provides the political cover to ease the sanctions, only because of what trump did? Never before...really?
Meeting with Trump reduced, if not eliminated, Kim's status as an international pariah and China announced shortly after their meeting that they would ease sanctions, which they did. The meeting was a huge bargaining chip that the Trump gave to Kim for nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2018, 08:44 AM
 
2,830 posts, read 2,502,245 times
Reputation: 2737
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
You are drinking some potent Kool Aid there, comrade. You might actually be the Kool Aid man.


No, my friend, you are the one drinking the koolaid. I provided a logical argument, you provided an emotional, factless statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 08:57 AM
 
Location: In the reddest part of the bluest state
5,752 posts, read 2,779,493 times
Reputation: 4925
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
No, my friend, you are the one drinking the koolaid. I provided a logical argument, you provided an emotional, factless statement.
No, your argument was not based in fact as I pointed out. Kim did not agree to anything aside from an agreement to work towards a goal with no clear definition.
Any suppositions made past that point are based on belief. Or emotion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
We’ll still have his nice speeches ..

Obama sold himself as the “change “ , “transformational “ President and failed to deliver .

Trump is delivering on it .
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
How?
Well, Trump does change and transform his statements daily, sometimes hourly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:02 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,768 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
No, my friend, you are the one drinking the koolaid. I provided a logical argument, you provided an emotional, factless statement.
You didn't provide a "logical argument". You falsely claimed that North Korea agreed, in writing, to denuclearize. They did no such thing. You either believed a lie (e.g., drinking the Kool Aid) because you haven't been keeping up to date or are intentionally spreading misinformation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
What is it with you people blaming Trump for North Korea not sticking to their agreement to denuclearize? It makes no sense (well actually it makes perfect sense...) why you continue to undermine our own country's leadership while supporting our enemies. Political biases aside, what good can possibly come of that?

Kim literally agreed, in writing, to denuclearize. And yes, that literally means to remove nuclear weapons. There is no grey area here... complete removal, that is the definition. Look it up.
Wait, you mean Kim went back on a promise? How could have anyone have known that the Kims don't keep their promises?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:04 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,768 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Wait, you mean Kim went back on a promise? How could have anyone have known that the Kims don't keep their promises?
Actually, they didn't even need to renege on their promise because they only committed to generally working towards a vague goal of denuclearization and nothing more. That's how little Trump achieved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:05 AM
 
2,830 posts, read 2,502,245 times
Reputation: 2737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Read my post [ #116 ] above. The North Koreans said what Trump wanted to hear, they got what they wanted, Trump claimed victory and you bought into it.

North Korea has backed out. They want us to lift our nuclear protection off of South Korea and Japan.
There's just one small flaw in your logic: The situation is still unfolding. You're acting as though the summit was the final nail in the coffin -- the last attempt that will be made to solve the North Korean problem -- which is just silly thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:07 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,768 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
There's just one small flaw in your logic: The situation is still unfolding. You're acting as though the summit was the final nail in the coffin -- the last attempt that will be made to solve the North Korean problem -- which is just silly thinking.
The situation is not unfolding. The Kim regime has continued to do what they have always done and Trump gave them something of significant value in exchange for nothing. Trump got so little that North Korea didn't even have to breach their agreement because Trump only extracted a vague and unenforceable commitment to work towards vague future goals. Astounding stuff.

Of course the US will continue to work to resolve the North Korea situation. The point was that the North Korea summit was not only a failure, it hurt long-term US strategic interests by surrendering a significant bargaining chip in exchange for nothing. The idea that someone in the future may have success in North Korea will not change that fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Actually, they didn't even need to renege on their promise because they only committed to generally working towards a vague goal of denuclearization and nothing more. That's how little Trump achieved.
So he reneged on a promise to discuss the possibility of working towards something maybe. Even better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top