Mueller is reportedly examining whether Trump's tweets about Comey and Jeff Sessions could open him up to a witness-tamp (claim, first amendment)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The walls are closing in. This would already be over if it wasn't for Trump's base protecting him.
Maybe your walls are closing in if you believe that rubbish.
Are you suffering from Hillary syndrome where you want to blame everything and everyone for not getting what you want?
Trump's base is hardly part of the swamp, and the denizens of that swamp would have taken Trump down by now if they had anything on him.
The hypocrisy is that when Obama was potentially influence peddling, many a liberal was saying "he is the potus, so he can do or say what he wants". Now of course, Trump having Russian dressing on a salad is worthy of derision.
As another poster said above, it is pathetic that Mueller is at such a point as to be looking into Trump's tweets. Maybe it is just an excuse to keep the investigation open.
Even liberal constitutional scholars like Dershowitz and Turley both think these efforts to try and criminalize the presidency for political reasons is dangerous to our republic.
Both were Obama supporters, so they are hardly part of "Trump's base".
The walls are closing in. The noose is tightening. Things are moving at warp speed. I'm barely even laughing as I write this because....THIS TIME...you really got him!
The special counsel Robert Mueller is reportedly looking into whether President Donald Trump's tweets could open him up not only to obstruction of justice, but a potential witness tampering charge.
Mueller is reportedly focusing specifically on Trump's tweets about Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former FBI Director James Comey.
Trump's lawyers are said to be worried that Mueller's team is centering its obstruction case around a consistent pattern of behavior on Trump's part that could point to attempts to obstruct justice or influence witness testimony. https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...r-probe-2018-7
Meanwhile page, strozk, mCcabe, ohr, comey, rice, lynch, podesta, abaedin, Hillary emails don't amount to a hill of beans.
Trump just has to claim Strozk's excuse, oh it was just talk.
The DOJ corruption is apparent to everyone, despite the effort by the media propaganda machine to convince us it isn't.
Remember when that judge ignored a legal document to rule that spurious comments made by trump overruled the legal language in the document re the temp ban.
That is prosecution by thought control!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then we have the corrupt DOJ emails and their thoughts don't count in the final judgment.
The corruption at the highest levels is astounding, even more so, the blatant, in your face, behavior by the DOJ and SP clearly states they don't care if you see they are corrupt, because they have all the power!
This investigation is sad, just searching for something, anything to charge him with. A tweet? That reeks of desperation
Not exactly. They know he's guilty, now they have to collect evidence substantial enough to prove it in a courtroom. What you can prove is all that counts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
