Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
You need to send Hillary a box of chocolates or something. If she didn't exist, you wouldn't be able to post about Trump at all.
But, since you brought up the subject, What laws did she violate? Private server? Sending classified emails unsecured? What?
What evidence was produced and presented that she committed a crime, and did so with criminal intent? Why do you believe she was not charged and prosecuted by the head of the FBI, who was also the one who jerked the rug out from under her by announcing the reopening of the investigation eleven days before the election? Educate us.
|
"What evidence was produced and presented that she committed a crime, and did so with criminal intent? Why do you believe she was not charged and prosecuted by the head of the FBI,"
Sometimes we have to repeat ourselves a MILLION times and some of you STILL ignore it and repeat the same old questions.
May if you pulled your eyes away from the alphabet "news" you WOULD no.
Why did you ask these questions? I thought all you libs were super educated and super smart n no EVERYTHING.
I'll answer your silly questions just to prove how ignorant some on the left are.
"What evidence was produced and presented that she committed a crime,"
"h
ttps://asweetdoseofreality.com/2016...lary-off-hook/
Quote:
Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?
Comey: That’s what I said.
Gowdy: OK. Well, I’m looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long.
Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said “I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material.†That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?
Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account.
Comey: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there’s no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
Comey: No."
"
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
The FBI also discovered
several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.
Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2, From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received000 additional e-mails were “up-classified†to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.â€
HAVING CLASSIFIED MATERIAL on a private server is AGAINST THE LAW.
1. Mishandling Classified Information
Executive Order 13526 and
18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at
The Daily Caller delved into this angle:
"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.
'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'â€
Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch's security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.
Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus
pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.
18 USC 1924 reads:
Whoever being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act
Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:
“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.â€
According to the original story on Clinton's emails
published in The New York Times:
"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.
In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."
The fact that the State Department combs through the
55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.
3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the
Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:
“'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request.â€
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a
preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:
“'Hillary Clinton’s system was designed to defy Freedom of Information Act requests, which is designed to defy the law.'â€
[mga_video id=8oBEhNirSSg]
These are just three of the
potential violations that Clinton may have committed by using a personal email account to conduct official State business. More information will be provided as this story continues to develop.
Supporters of Hillary Clinton
continue to ask the equivalent of 'What difference does it make?'with regard to the former Secretary of State's use of a personal email account to conduct official State Department business.
Meanwhile, many investigative reporters are combing through federal rules and regulations to discover what
criminal charges Clinton could face for her actions.
Here are the three most frequently cited laws that appear to have been violated by Clinton:
Executive Order 13526 and
18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at
The Daily Caller delved into this angle:
"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.
'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'â€
Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch's security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.
Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus
pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.
2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act
Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:
“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.â€
According to the original story on Clinton's emails
published in The New York Times:
"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.
In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."
The fact that the State Department combs through the
55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.
3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the
Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:
“'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request.â€
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a
preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:
“'Hillary Clinton’s system was designed to defy Freedom of Information Act requests, which is designed to defy the law.'â€
[mga_video id=8oBEhNirSSg]
These are just three of the
potential violations that Clinton may have committed by using a personal email account to conduct official State business. More information will be provided as this story continues to develop.
Supporters of Hillary Clinton continue to ask the equivalent of 'What difference does it make?' with regard to the former Secretary of State's use of a personal email account to conduct official State Department business.Meanwhile, many investigative reporters are combing through federal rules and regulations to discover what criminal charges Clinton could face for her actions.Here are the three most frequently cited laws that appear to have been violated by Clinton:1. Mishandling Classified InformationExecutive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'â€Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch's security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records ActSection 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.â€According to the original story on Clinton's emails published in The New York Times:"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."The fact that the State Department combs through the 55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:“'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request.â€MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:“'Hillary Clinton’s system was designed to defy Freedom of Information Act requests, which is designed to defy the law.'â€[mga_video id=8oBEhNirSSg]These are just three of the potential violations that Clinton may have committed by using a personal email account to conduct official State business. More information will be provided as this story continues to develop.
"intent". NO WHERE in any of the laws pertaining to the handling of Classified material uses the word "intent"
If YOU are going to base your claims on it, YOU provide it.
Setting up a PRIVATE server to handle all her government business did NOT JUST HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT . Her "intent" was to set up the server for ALL her government relate business.
"Why do you believe she was not charged " and prosecuted by the head of the FBI,"
First, Comey goes say back to the Whitewater scandal and has a record of being involved in clinton "investigation and NOTHING is done.
Second, the FBI does NOT prosecute.
You asked, you GOT IT!
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
