U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:19 AM
 
14,417 posts, read 5,201,414 times
Reputation: 6819

Advertisements

So the New York Times is apparently going full racist.

Quote:
Newest NYT Editorial Board Member: 'White Men Are Bull****'

The New York Times’ newest editorial hire has a history of racist tweets against white people.
NYT announced on Wednesday that they hired Sarah Jeong to join their editorial board. Jeong previously wrote for the Verge and authored “The Internet of Garbage,” a book about online harassment and free speech.

Shortly after Jeong’s hire, Twitter users unearthed old tweets in which she expressed an extreme distaste for white people.

“Dumbass ****ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants,” she tweeted in 2016.
[CENTER] [/CENTER]

Another tweet reads, “oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men.”

{More at the Link}
Remember when Paula Deen was asked if she had ever "used the n-word"? By the way, who cares if she did, as this is a word that has been commonly and broadly used by people of every stripe over the last 50+ years.

Now if Deen had demonstrated a history of being openly hostile towards people based on their race - as this new editorial writer at the New York Times clearly has - then that would have been a different matter. Then there would have been a legitimate reason to condemn her for being a racist, in the same way that Sarah Jeong clearly is.

But nothing like that was ever produced against Paula Deen. Instead, she was effectively harassed out of her position on the cooking channel because of the bigotry towards anti-Southern white people by the increasingly fascist Democrat left.

If the New York Times does not fire Sarah Jeong, then they will clearly be a racism promoting hard-left newspaper.

Nobody need bother with the typical lie and deny response. The proof is in the pudding.

Last edited by Spartacus713; 08-02-2018 at 11:43 AM.. Reason: profanity
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Maryland
6,537 posts, read 4,981,142 times
Reputation: 7682
This is what happens when you try to redifine racism to be as racist towards whites as you want. It’s like they actually believe they found some magic loophole.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:22 AM
 
Location: FL
7,081 posts, read 2,084,219 times
Reputation: 3184
Its like they hired a drunk teenager, as that's all she amounts to.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:24 AM
 
14,417 posts, read 5,201,414 times
Reputation: 6819
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiftymh View Post
This is what happens when you try to redifine racism to be as racist towards whites as you want. It’s like they actually believe they found some magic loophole.

They have outed themselves as severe racists. That is what they have accomplished.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:33 AM
 
14,417 posts, read 5,201,414 times
Reputation: 6819
Here is another racist beauty by the New York Times newest editorial board member Susan Jong:
“Are white people predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically only being fit to live underground like groveling goblins”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...r-doesnt-seem/

Is the New York Times now trying to suggest that this kind of racism and bigotry is now acceptable in their opinion under the banner of the Democrat left's "Political correctness" agenda?

Are you kidding me? Really?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:37 AM
 
12,764 posts, read 6,675,642 times
Reputation: 4315
I'm sure they will try to justify it by saying "Well if POTUS can be a racist..."
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:42 AM
 
19,771 posts, read 10,062,534 times
Reputation: 11880
If she were a nobody and made those claims about any other people, she would be doxxed and canned immediately.
“But Trump..”
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:45 AM
 
14,067 posts, read 7,788,191 times
Reputation: 15999
This stuff isn't just racist, it is sociopathically racist. I have never heard such things said about ANY race in my life, much less by educated people. They are evil.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:45 AM
 
14,417 posts, read 5,201,414 times
Reputation: 6819
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
I'm sure they will try to justify it by saying "Well if POTUS can be a racist..."
What has POTUS ever said that was racist?

Being racist is not established by the leftist lynch mob indiscriminately ganging up on someone and collectively calling them a racist. These people have discredited themselves with their misuse and ridiculous overuse of this tactic, going back quite a few years now.

The next time someone produces something that Trump did or said that clearly establishes him as a racist or a bigot, will be the first time.

If someone is a racist or a bigot, there will be a clear demonstration of that which can be seen, and just falling on the wrong side of what the leftists think is not even close to establishing that.

But this woman's tweets clearly are.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2018, 10:51 AM
 
14,067 posts, read 7,788,191 times
Reputation: 15999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Here is another racist beauty by the New York Times newest editorial board member Susan Jong:
“Are white people predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically only being fit to live underground like groveling goblins”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...r-doesnt-seem/

Is the New York Times now trying to suggest that this kind of racism and bigotry is now acceptable in their opinion under the banner of the Democrat left's "Political correctness" agenda?

Are you kidding me? Really?
How do you write something like that and look your white co-workers in the eye the next day? Maybe they are lefties who agree and are planning their guilt-ridden descent into the sewer tunnels.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top